SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018
Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Developed for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review.Current diabetes reports · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review on the measurement properties of diabetes-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring physical functioning in people with type 2 diabetes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of depression questionnaires in adult patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Vitamin D Supplementation for the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2022Trial
- Selecting a depression measure for research: A critical examination of five common self-report scales.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Review
- A behaviour change intervention promoting physical activity following dysvascular amputation: Protocol for a pilot study.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Interconnected Complexity of Diabetes and Depression.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- An adaptive multi-graph neural network with multimodal feature fusion learning for MDD detection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A carefully planned resistance training program improves strength, fitness and depressive symptoms for a woman with type 2 diabetes.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2024Article
- Prospective health care costs and lost work days associated with diabetes-related distress and depression symptoms among 1488 individuals with diabetes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in cancer patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of a Community-Based Prediction Model for Depression in Elderly Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Validity of the short-form five-item Problem Area in Diabetes questionnaire as a depression screening tool in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2023Article
- Patient-reported outcomes for people with diabetes: what and how to measure? A narrative review.Diabetologia · 2023Review
- Availability of psychological care in pediatric diabetes centers - a real need?Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2023Review
- Test-retest reliability and measurement error of the WHO-5 Well-being Index and the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire (PAID) used in telehealth among patients with type 1 diabetes.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of the Depression Inventory for Type 1 Diabetes (DID-1).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Self-Report Measure of Diabetes Self-Management for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R) - Clinimetric Evidence From Five Studies.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
methodsA systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original articles, published in any language up to October 2016 were included. Eligibility for inclusion was independently assessed by three reviewers who worked in pairs. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of the questionnaires was rated per measurement property, based on the number and quality of the included studies and the reported results.
resultsOf 6286 unique hits, 21 studies met our criteria evaluating nine different questionnaires in multiple settings and languages. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable for the different measurement properties: 9/15 studies scored 'good' or 'excellent' on internal consistency, 2/5 on reliability, 0/1 on content validity, 10/10 on structural validity, 8/11 on hypothesis testing, 1/5 on cross-cultural validity, and 4/9 on criterion validity. For the CES-D, there was strong evidence for good internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity; moderate evidence for good criterion validity; and limited evidence for good cross-cultural validity. The PHQ-9 and WHO-5 also performed well on several measurement properties. However, the evidence for structural validity of the PHQ-9 was inconclusive. The WHO-5 was less extensively researched and originally not developed to measure depression.
conclusionCurrently, the CES-D is best supported for measuring depressive symptoms in diabetes patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.