Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396646›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018

The Headache-Attributed Lost Time (HALT) Indices: measures of burden for clinical management and population-based research.

T J Steiner, R B Lipton, Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign against Headache

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03568617 (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Prevention Treatment of Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03568617 naunknown statusnot on this map

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Prevention Treatment of Chronic Migraine: a Single Arm Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled15ConditionsChronic MigraineArmsrTMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

T J SteinerDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.
R B LiptonDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign against Headache
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden attributable to headache disorders has multiple components: a simple measure summarising them all does not exist. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) instrument has proved useful, estimating productive time lost in the preceding 3 months due to the disabling effect of headache. We developed adaptations of MIDAS for purposes of the Global Campaign against Headache, embracing epidemiological studies and the provision of clinical management aids.

methodsWe reviewed the structure, content, wording and scoring of MIDAS and made revisions, developing the Headache-Attributed Lost Time (HALT) Indices in three versions. Over 10 years, these were employed in multiple epidemiological and clinical studies in countries worldwide.

resultsIn the original HALT-90, we made no changes to the structure and scoring of MIDAS, but used wording in questions 1-4 that we believed would be more widely understood and more easily translated into other languages. Of the two alternative versions, HALT-30 kept the same structure, question format and wording except that "3 months" was replaced by "1 month". HALT-7/30 was a variant of HALT-30: focusing only on lost work time for population-based studies of headache-attributed burden, it enquired into lost days in the preceding month (30 days) and week (7 days).

conclusionsThree versions of the HALT Indices serve different purposes as measures of headache-attributed burden, and offer different means of scoring. In studies using HALT as a population measure, there is no need to reflect the states of individuals, whereas a measure over shorter periods than 3 months is likely to be more reliable through better recall. Assessment of individual patients prior to treatment may best estimate impact if enquiry is made into the preceding 90 days, except in cases where headache is highly frequent. Follow-up in clinical management may be better served by assessments over 30 rather than 90 days.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessEfficiencyDisability EvaluationHeadacheHeadache DisordersHumansMigraine DisordersResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsassessmentburdenGlobal Campaign against Headacheheadache disordersinstrumentsmanagementpopulation-based studies

Identifiers

PMID29396646
PMCPMC5796955
OpenAlexW2787312989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.