Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396607›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2018

[Sinonasal tumors : News from the WHO with special reference to mesenchymal entities].

A Agaimy, F Haller, A Hartmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A AgaimyInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. abbas.agaimy@uk-erlangen.de.
F HallerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
A HartmannInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two decades have seen significant advances in the pathology of sinonasal tract neoplasms. This was the consequence of the availability of several innovative diagnostic tools, which resulted in a dynamic evolution of entities and splitting of newly defined or conceptualized entities and subtypes that have been included in the spectrum of old heterogeneous diseases. Most of these new tumor subtypes have distinctive demographic, clinicopathologic, and biological characteristics with prognostic and therapeutic implications for individual patients. NUT carcinoma (NUT midline carcinoma) was separated from the spectrum of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) and is defined by specific recurrent translocation. On the other hand, the recently described SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma (while probably representing a distinctive clinicopathologic entity) remained as a variant in the SNUC spectrum. A new neoplasm in the spectrum of non-keratinizing carcinomas is the human papillomavirus(HPV)-related adenoid-cystic-like sinonasal carcinoma with its distinctive, albeit diverse, morphology. In the group of small round-cell malignancies, adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma has been delineated as an important diagnostic pitfall given its prominent epithelial differentiation. Inclusion of the biphenotypic (myoneural) sinonasal sarcoma (BSS) as a low-grade malignancy defined by recurrent PAX3/MAML3-translocation represents an important feature of the new WHO classification given the distinctive biological behavior of this low-grade non-metastasizing rare entity, which has been uniformly misclassified as a peripheral nerve sheath tumor or leiomyosarcoma in the past. Recognition of CTNNB1 mutations and STAT6/NAB2 gene fusions as defining genetic markers for sinonasal hemangio‑/glomangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumors, respectively, represents another important achievement in recent years. This review summarizes the new aspects in the WHO classification and also addresses recently described entities that have not been included in the WHO classification.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Small CellPapillomaviridaeParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsSolitary Fibrous TumorsHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisTranscription FactorsWorld Health OrganizationTranscription FactorsAdamantinomaEwing sarcomaGenetic markersSinonasal undifferentiated carcinomaSMARCB1 protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.