Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396167›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2018

Challenges in vascular tissue engineering for diabetic patients.

Jhilmil Dhulekar, Agneta Simionescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Role of Gut Microbiota in Diabetic HFpEF: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. DYNAMIC BIOREACTOR MODEL TO MIMIC EARLY CARDIAC FIBROSIS IN DIABETES.Journal of mechanics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jhilmil DhulekarClemson University, Department of Bioengineering, United States.
Agneta SimionescuClemson University, Department of Bioengineering, United States. Electronic address: agneta@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · US

Funding

Targeted Nano-therapeutics for Neural RegenerationP20GM103444 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MARKWALD, ROGER R, VYAVAHARE, NAREN R · 2012 to 2018
$14.9M
Cell and matrix interactions in diabetic vascular tissue engineering modelsR01HL133303 · NHLBI · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SIMIONESCU, AGNETA · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133303NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia coexist in diabetes and result in inflammation, degeneration, and impaired tissue remodeling, processes which are not conducive to the desired integration of tissue engineered products into the surrounding tissues. There are several challenges for vascular tissue engineering such as non-thrombogenicity, adequate burst pressure and compliance, suturability, appropriate remodeling responses, and vasoactivity, but, under diabetic conditions, an additional challenge needs to be considered: the aggressive oxidative environment generated by the high glucose and lipid concentrations that lead to the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in the vascular wall. Extracellular matrix-based scaffolds have adequate physical properties and are biocompatible, however, these scaffolds are altered in diabetes by the formation AGEs and impaired collagen degradation, consequently increasing vascular wall stiffness. In addition, vascular cells detect and respond to altered stimuli from the matrix by pathological remodeling of the vascular wall. Due to the immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), they are frequently used in tissue engineering in order to protect the scaffolds from inflammation. MSCs together with antioxidant treatments of the scaffolds are expected to protect the vascular grafts from diabetes-induced alterations. In conclusion, as one of the most daunting environments that could damage the ECM and its interaction with cells is progressively built in diabetes, we recommend that cells and scaffolds used in vascular tissue engineering for diabetic patients are tested in diabetic animal models, in order to obtain valuable results regarding their resistance to diabetic adversities. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Almost 25 million Americans have diabetes, characterized by high levels of blood sugar that binds to tissues and disturbs the function of cardiovascular structures. Therefore, patients with diabetes have a high risk of cardiovascular diseases. Surgery is required to replace diseased arteries with implants, but these fail after 5-10 years because they are made of non-living materials, not resistant to diabetes. New tissue engineering materials are developed, based on the patients' own stem cells, isolated from fat, and added to extracellular matrix-based scaffolds. Our main concern is that diabetes could damage the tissue-like implants. Thus we review studies related to the effect of diabetes on tissue components and recommend antioxidant treatments to increase the resistance of implants to diabetes.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisBlood Vessel ProsthesisDiabetes MellitusDiabetic AngiopathiesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAdvanced glycation end productsAntioxidantsBiological scaffoldsMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID29396167
PMCPMC5871600
OpenAlexW2793880234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.