Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396080›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2018

Pediatrician and Behavioral Clinician-Delivered Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment: Substance Use and Depression Outcomes.

Stacy Sterling, Andrea H Kline-Simon, Constance Weisner, Ashley Jones, Derek D Satre

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. What's known about implementing co-located paediatric integrated care: a scoping review.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stacy SterlingDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. Electronic address: stacy.a.sterling@kp.org.
Andrea H Kline-SimonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Constance WeisnerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Ashley JonesDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Derek D SatreDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Screening for Youth Alcohol and Drug Use: A Study of Primary Care ProvidersR01AA016204 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WEISNER, CONSTANCE M. · 2007 to 2014
$3.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly intervention for adolescent substance use and mental health problems may mitigate potential harm. We examined patient outcomes from a pragmatic trial of two modalities of delivering screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and usual care (UC) in pediatric primary care.

methodsAll clinic pediatricians (n = 52) were randomized to three arms: (1) pediatrician-only, in which pediatricians were trained to deliver SBIRT; (2) embedded behavioral clinician (BC), in which pediatricians were trained to refer eligible adolescents to a BC who administered SBIRT; and (3) UC. Using electronic health record data, changes in past year substance use and depression symptoms between the index visit and next screening visit were examined across treatment arms.

resultsAmong patients who endorsed substance use and/or depression symptoms or were eligible for further assessments, brief interventions, and referrals based on clinician assessment at the index visit, 648 patients (mean age = 15.2 [standard deviation = 1.2]) were rescreened at a follow-up visit between 6 months and 2 years later. Among all patients, self-reported substance use rates did not differ over time or across arms, and depression symptoms increased over time. The embedded BC arm had lower odds of having depression symptoms at follow-up than the physician-only arm, and lower odds than the UC arm although not significant; we found no differences between the pediatrician-only and UC arms.

conclusionsThe increase in depression symptoms over time highlights this population's vulnerability and the importance of developing appropriate interventions. An embedded BC in pediatric primary care trained in SBIRT may benefit patients with depression symptoms.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationAdolescentCognitive Behavioral TherapyDelivery of Health CareDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningPediatriciansPrimary Health CareSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAlcoholDepressionDrugIntegratedPrimary careSBIRTScreeningSubstance

Identifiers

PMID29396080
PMCPMC5866770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.