Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396014›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2018

Generalists and Specialists: A New View of How MHC Class I Molecules Fight Infectious Pathogens.

Jim Kaufman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AncestralAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. T cell receptors for antigen on intraepithelial cytolytic T lymphocytes in celiac disease engage enterocyte HLA-E and HLA-B.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Quantification of heterogeneity in human CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jim KaufmanUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Pathology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK; University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB2 0ES, UK. Electronic address: jfk31@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089305/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 110106/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In comparison with the major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) of typical mammals, the chicken MHC is simple and compact with a single dominantly expressed class I molecule that can determine the immune response. In addition to providing useful information for the poultry industry and allowing insights into the evolution of the adaptive immune system, the simplicity of the chicken MHC has allowed the discovery of phenomena that are more difficult to discern in the more complicated mammalian systems. This review discusses the new concept that poorly expressed promiscuous class I alleles act as generalists to protect against a wide variety of infectious pathogens, while highly expressed fastidious class I alleles can act as specialists to protect against new and dangerous pathogens.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAllelesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexHistocompatibility Antigens Class I

Identifiers

PMID29396014
PMCPMC5929564
OpenAlexW2787414552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.