Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29395287›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2018

Development and validation of an MRI-based model to predict response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Philippe Bulens, Alice Couwenberg, Karin Haustermans, Annelies Debucquoy, Vincent Vandecaveye, Marielle Philippens, Mu Zhou, Olivier Gevaert, Martijn Intven

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Model development and external validation using MRI radiomics.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Philippe BulensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
Alice CouwenbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karin HaustermansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: karin.haustermans@uzleuven.be.
Annelies DebucquoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent VandecaveyeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
Marielle PhilippensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mu ZhouStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, USA.
Olivier GevaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, USA.
Martijn IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLStanford University · US

Funding

Radiogenomics Framework for Non-Invasive Personalized MedicineR01EB020527 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2015 to 2018
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo safely implement organ preserving treatment strategies for patients with rectal cancer, well-considered selection of patients with favourable response is needed. In this study, we develop and validate an MRI-based response predicting model.

methodsA multivariate model using T2-volumetric and DWI parameters before and 6 weeks after chemoradiation (CRT) was developed using a cohort of 85 rectal cancer patients and validated in an external cohort of 55 patients that underwent preoperative CRT.

resultsTwenty-two patients (26%) achieved ypT0-1N0 response in the development cohort versus 13 patients (24%) in the validation cohort. Two T2-volumetric parameters (ΔVolume% and Sphere_post) and two DWI parameters (ADC_avg_post and ADCratio_avg) were retained in a model predicting (near-)complete response (ypT0-1N0). In the development cohort, this model had a good predictive performance (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98). Validation of the model in an external cohort resulted in a similar performance (AUC = 0.88 95% CI 0.79-0.98).

conclusionAn MRI-based prediction model of (near-)complete pathological response following CRT in rectal cancer patients, shows a high predictive performance in an external validation cohort. The clinically relevant features in the model make it an interesting tool for implementation of organ-preserving strategies in rectal cancer.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDWIMRIRectal cancerResponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID29395287
PMCPMC5990635
OpenAlexW2794095348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.