Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394946›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2018

Clinical value of miR-198-5p in lung squamous cell carcinoma assessed using microarray and RT-qPCR.

Yue-Ya Liang, Jia-Cheng Huang, Rui-Xue Tang, Wen-Jie Chen, Peng Chen, Wei-Luan Cen, Ke Shi, Li Gao, Xiang Gao, An-Gui Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The promising role and prognostic value of miR-198 in human diseases.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yue-Ya LiangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Cheng HuangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Xue TangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Jie ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Peng ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Luan CenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Ke ShiDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Li GaoDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
An-Gui LiuDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Tong PengDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Su-Ning HuangDepartment of Radiotherapy, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Ye-Ying FangDepartment of Radiotherapy, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China. fangyeying2010@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0598-6011
Yong-Yao GuDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China. gyy_613@sina.com.

Funding

Future Academic Star of Guangxi Medical University WLXSZX17001Open fund of Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Biological Molecular Medicine Research GXBMR201601Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University GXMUYSF2014032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine the clinical value of miR-198-5p in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

methodsGene Expression Omnibus (GEO) microarray datasets were used to explore the miR-198-5p expression and its diagnostic value in LUSC. Real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate the expression of miR-198-5p in 23 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) LUSC tissues and corresponding non-cancerous tissues. The correlation between miR-198-5p expression and clinic pathological features was assessed. Meanwhile, putative target messenger RNAs of miR-198-5p were identified based on the analysis of differentially expressed genes in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 12 miRNA prediction tools. Subsequently, the putative target genes were sent to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses.

resultsMiR-198-5p was low expressed in LUSC tissues. The combined standard mean difference (SMD) values of miR-198-5p expression based on GEO datasets were - 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.54, - 0.06) and - 0.39 (95% CI - 0.83, 0.05) using fixed effect model and random effect model, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were not sufficiently high, as the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.7749 (Q* = 0.7143) based on summarized receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves constructed using GEO datasets. Based on the in-house RT-qPCR, miR-198-5p expression was 4.3826 ± 1.7660 in LUSC tissues and 4.4522 ± 1.8263 in adjacent normal tissues (P = 0.885). The expression of miR-198-5p was significantly higher in patients with early TNM stages (I-II) than that in cases with advanced TNM stages (III-IV) (5.4400 ± 1.5277 vs 3.5690 ± 1.5228, P = 0.008). Continuous variable-based meta-analysis of GEO and PCR data displayed the SMD values of - 0.26 (95% CI - 0.48, - 0.04) and - 0.34 (95% CI - 0.71, 0.04) based on fixed and random effect models, respectively. As for the diagnostic value of miR-198-5p, the AUC based on the SROC curve using GEO and PCR data was 0.7351 (Q* = 0.6812). In total, 542 genes were identified as the targets of miR-198-5p. The most enriched Gene Ontology terms were epidermis development among biological processes, cell junction among cellular components, and protein dimerization activity among molecule functions. The pathway of non-small cell lung cancer was the most significant pathway identified using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis.

conclusionThe expression of miR-198-5p is related to the TNM stage. Thus, miR-198-5p might play an important role via its target genes in LUSC.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OntologyHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN198 microRNA, humanBioinformaticsExpressionLung squamous cell carcinomaMiR-198-5pTarget genes

Identifiers

PMID29394946
PMCPMC5797354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.