ArticleBMC family practice2018
Patients' experiences of living with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS): a qualitative study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Beliefs, Perceptions, and Experiences of Individuals With Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography of Qualitative Studies.Physical therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Assessment of nausea across pregnancy and its association with maternal psychological status and perinatal outcomes: a prospective observational study in pregnant women.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- The lived experience of long COVID: A thematic analysis of an in-depth interview study.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Integrating narrative medicine into post-genocide Rwandan healthcare: a call for trauma-responsive medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Anticipating the Future in an Uncertain Present: How Individuals Living With Medically Unexplained Cognitive Complaints Value Biomarker-Based Prognostics.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Optimism, Resilience, and General Self-Efficacy Predict Lower Somatic Burden during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Medically unexplained pain and suicidal ideation among US adults.Journal of affective disorders · 2024Article
- We didn't start the fire…or did we?-a narrative review of medical gaslighting and introduction to medical invalidation.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- Living with invisible medical disabilities: experiences and challenges of Chilean university students disclosed in medical consultations.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Understanding Patient-Provider Interaction, Treatment Acceptance, and Outcomes in Medically Unexplained Symptoms.Cureus · 2022Article
- Family narratives of lives with persistent physical symptom conditions.Clinical child psychology and psychiatry · 2021Article
- Making sense of symptoms, clinicians and systems: a qualitative evaluation of a facilitated support group for patients with medically unexplained symptoms.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- A Service Evaluation of the Experiences of Patients With Functional Neurological Disorders Within the NHS.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Patients' experiences with fluctuations in persistent physical symptoms: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Views of Patients With Medically Unexplained Symptoms on The BodyMind ApproachFrontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Between three chairs: Experiences of being a patient with chronic widespread pain in an intersectoral setting in Denmark.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are common in primary care, and pose a communicative and therapeutic challenge to GPs. Although much has been written about GPs' frustration and difficulties while dealing with these patients, research presenting the patients' perspectives on MUS still seems to be scarce. Existing studies have demonstrated the patients' desire to make sense of symptoms, addressed the necessity for appropriate and acceptable explanation of MUS, and revealed stigmatization of patients with symptoms of mental origin. Treatment in primary care should focus on the patient's most essential needs and concerns. The objective of this paper is to explore Polish patients' perspectives on living with MUS.
methodsA qualitative content analysis of 20 filmed, semi-structured interviews with patients presenting MUS (8 men and 12 women, aged 18 to 57) was conducted. All patients were diagnosed with distinctive somatoform disorders (F45), and presented the symptoms for at least 2 years. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed independently by two researchers.
resultsFour major themes emerged: (1) experiences of symptoms; (2) explanations for symptoms; (3) coping; (4) expectations about healthcare. Within the first theme, the patients identified the following sub-themes: persistence of symptoms or variability, and negative emotions. Patients who observed that their symptoms had changed over time were better disposed to accept the existence of a relationship between the symptoms and the mind. The second theme embraced the following sub-themes: (1) personal explanations; (2) social explanations; (3) somatic explanations. The most effective coping strategies the patients mentioned included: the rationalization of the symptoms, self-development and ignoring the symptoms. The majority of our respondents had no expectations from the healthcare system, and stated they did not use medical services; instead, they admitted to visiting psychologists or psychiatrists privately.
conclusionPatients with MUS have their own experiences of illness. They undertake attempts to interpret their symptoms and learn to live with them. The role of the GP in this process is significant, especially when access to psychological help is restricted. Management of patients with MUS in the Polish healthcare system can be improved, if access to psychologists and psychotherapists is facilitated and increased financial resources are allocated for primary care. Patients with MUS can benefit from a video/filmed consultation with a follow-up analysis with their GP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.