Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394518›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2018

Novel encoding and updating of positional, or directional, spatial cues are processed by distinct hippocampal subfields: Evidence for parallel information processing and the "what" stream.

Thu-Huong Hoang, Verena Aliane, Denise Manahan-Vaughan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interplay of hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression in enabling memory representations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Real-time imaging ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Parallel processing streams in the hippocampus.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thu-Huong HoangMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany.
Verena AlianeMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany.
Denise Manahan-VaughanMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9283-9609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific roles of hippocampal subfields in spatial information processing and encoding are, as yet, unclear. The parallel map theory postulates that whereas the CA1 processes discrete environmental features (positional cues used to generate a "sketch map"), the dentate gyrus (DG) processes large navigation-relevant landmarks (directional cues used to generate a "bearing map"). Additionally, the two-streams hypothesis suggests that hippocampal subfields engage in differentiated processing of information from the "where" and the "what" streams. We investigated these hypotheses by analyzing the effect of exploration of discrete "positional" features and large "directional" spatial landmarks on hippocampal neuronal activity in rats. As an indicator of neuronal activity we measured the mRNA induction of the immediate early genes (IEGs), Arc and Homer1a. We observed an increase of this IEG mRNA in CA1 neurons of the distal neuronal compartment and in proximal CA3, after novel spatial exploration of discrete positional cues, whereas novel exploration of directional cues led to increases in IEG mRNA in the lower blade of the DG and in proximal CA3. Strikingly, the CA1 did not respond to directional cues and the DG did not respond to positional cues. Our data provide evidence for both the parallel map theory and the two-streams hypothesis and suggest a precise compartmentalization of the encoding and processing of "what" and "where" information occurs within the hippocampal subfields.

Indexed as

AnimalsCuesCytoskeletal ProteinsExploratory BehaviorGene Expression RegulationHippocampusHomer Scaffolding ProteinsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLong-Term Synaptic DepressionMaleMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsOrientationRats, Wistaractivity regulated cytoskeletal-associated proteinCytoskeletal ProteinsHomer1 protein, ratHomer Scaffolding ProteinsNerve Tissue Proteinsfluorescence in situ hybridizationhippocampusimmediate early geneinformation encodingspatial learning

Identifiers

PMID29394518
PMCPMC5947642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.