Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394325›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2018

Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter.

Jennifer Chesters, Riikka Möttönen, Kate E Watkins

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06278233 (An Investigation of the Effect of 5 Consecutive Days of Bihemispheric TDCS on Speech Fluency in Individuals With Stuttering), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06278233 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Investigation of the Effect of 5 Consecutive Days of Bihemispheric TDCS on Speech Fluency in Individuals With Stuttering

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiruni UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsStuttering, AdultArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reactive Inhibitory Control Precedes Overt Stuttering Events.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stuttering as a spectrum disorder: A hypothesis.Current research in neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer ChestersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Riikka MöttönenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kate E WatkinsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000566Medical Research Council MR/K023772/1Medical Research Council MR/N025539/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

See Crinion (doi:10.1093/brain/awy075) for a scientific commentary on this article.Stuttering is a neurodevelopmental condition affecting 5% of children, and persisting in 1% of adults. Promoting lasting fluency improvement in adults who stutter is a particular challenge. Novel interventions to improve outcomes are of value, therefore. Previous work in patients with acquired motor and language disorders reported enhanced benefits of behavioural therapies when paired with transcranial direct current stimulation. Here, we report the results of the first trial investigating whether transcranial direct current stimulation can improve speech fluency in adults who stutter. We predicted that applying anodal stimulation to the left inferior frontal cortex during speech production with temporary fluency inducers would result in longer-lasting fluency improvements. Thirty male adults who stutter completed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex. Fifteen participants received 20 min of 1-mA stimulation on five consecutive days while speech fluency was temporarily induced using choral and metronome-timed speech. The other 15 participants received the same speech fluency intervention with sham stimulation. Speech fluency during reading and conversation was assessed at baseline, before and after the stimulation on each day of the 5-day intervention, and at 1 and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention. Anodal stimulation combined with speech fluency training significantly reduced the percentage of disfluent speech measured 1 week after the intervention compared with fluency intervention alone. At 6 weeks after the intervention, this improvement was maintained during reading but not during conversation. Outcome scores at both post-intervention time points on a clinical assessment tool (the Stuttering Severity Instrument, version 4) also showed significant improvement in the group receiving transcranial direct current stimulation compared with the sham group, in whom fluency was unchanged from baseline. We conclude that transcranial direct current stimulation combined with behavioural fluency intervention can improve fluency in adults who stutter. Transcranial direct current stimulation thereby offers a potentially useful adjunct to future speech therapy interventions for this population, for whom fluency therapy outcomes are currently limited.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSpeechStatistics, NonparametricStutteringTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29394325
PMCPMC6019054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.