Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394303›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2018

Increasing stomatal conductance in response to rising atmospheric CO2.

C Purcell, S P Batke, C Yiotis, R Caballero, W K Soh, M Murray, J C McElwain

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Increasing CONature · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Elevated COJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Enriched COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Disentangling the role of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance on rising forest water-use efficiency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C PurcellSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
S P BatkeSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
C YiotisSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
R CaballeroDepartment of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
W K SohSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
M MurraySchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
J C McElwainBotany Department, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Studies have indicated that plant stomatal conductance (gs) decreases in response to elevated atmospheric CO2, a phenomenon of significance for the global hydrological cycle. However, gs increases across certain CO2 ranges have been predicted by optimization models. The aim of this work was to demonstrate that under certain environmental conditions, gs can increase in response to elevated CO2. Methods: Using (1) an extensive, up-to-date synthesis of gs responses in free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)experiments, (2) in situ measurements across four biomes showing dynamic gs responses to a CO2 rise of ~50 ppm (characterizing the change in this greenhouse gas over the past three decades) and (3) a photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model, it is demonstrated that gs can in some cases increase in response to increasing atmospheric CO2. Key Results: Field observations are corroborated by an extensive synthesis of gs responses in FACE experiments showing that 11.8 % of gs responses under experimentally elevated CO2 are positive. They are further supported by a strong data-model fit (r2 = 0.607) using a stomatal optimization model applied to the field gs dataset. A parameter space identified in the Farquhar-Ball-Berry photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model confirms field observations of increasing gs under elevated CO2 in hot dry conditions. Contrary to the general assumption, positive gs responses to elevated CO2, although relatively rare, are a feature of woody taxa adapted to warm, low-humidity conditions, and this response is also demonstrated in global simulations using the Community Land Model (CLM4). Conclusions: The results contradict the over-simplistic notion that global vegetation always responds with decreasing gs to elevated CO2, a finding that has important implications for predicting future vegetation feedbacks on the hydrological cycle at the regional level.

Indexed as

Plant StomataPlant TranspirationCarbon DioxideEcosystemModels, TheoreticalPhotosynthesisCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID29394303
PMCPMC5946907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.