Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394265›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Impact of 2015 earthquakes on a local hospital in Nepal: A prospective hospital-based study.

Samita Giri, Kari Risnes, Oddvar Uleberg, Tormod Rogne, Sanu Krishna Shrestha, Øystein Petter Nygaard, Rajendra Koju, Erik Solligård

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Management of earthquake-related acute renal injury.World journal of nephrology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Burden of injuries in Nepal, 1990-2017: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samita GiriDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4464-4951
Kari RisnesChildrens Clinic, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Oddvar UlebergDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Tormod RogneDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sanu Krishna ShresthaDepartment of Emergency, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Øystein Petter NygaardDepartment of Neurosurgery, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Rajendra KojuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Erik SolligårdDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNatural disasters pose a great challenge to the health systems and individual health facilities. In low-resource settings, disaster preparedness systems are often limited and not been well described. Two devastating earthquakes hit Nepal within a 17-days period in 2015. This study aims to describe the burden and distribution of emergency cases to a local hospital.

methodsThis is a prospective observational study of patients presenting to a local hospital for a period of 21 days following the earthquake on April 25, 2015. Demographic and clinical information was prospectively registered for all patients in the systematic emergency registry. Systematic telephone interviews were conducted in a random sample of the patients 90 days after admission to the hospital.

resultsA total of 2,003 emergency patients were registered during the period. The average daily number of emergency patients during the first five days was almost five times higher (n = 150) than the pre-incident daily average (n = 35). The majority of injuries were fractures (58%), 348 (56%) in the lower extremities. A total of 345 surgical procedures were performed and the hospital treated 111 patients with severe injuries related to the earthquake (compartment syndrome, crush injury, and internal injury). Among those with follow-up interviews, over 90% reported that they had been severely affected by the earthquakes; complete house damage, living in temporary shelter, or loss of close family member.

conclusionThe hospital experienced a very high caseload during the first days, and the majority of patients needed orthopaedic services. The proportion of severely injured and in-hospital deaths were relatively low, probably indicating that the most severely injured did not reach the hospital in time. The experiences underline the need for robust and easily available local health services that can respond to disasters.

Indexed as

EarthquakesAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitals, RuralHumansMaleNepalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29394265
PMCPMC5796718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.