ReviewSurgical infections
Hypermetabolism and Nutritional Support in Sepsis.
Review in Surgical infections. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the predictive value of 3-day cumulative energy deficit for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis and nutritional risk: a retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- U-shaped association between serum triglyceride levels and mortality among septic patients: An analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.PloS one · 2023Article
- Single-cell deconstruction of post-sepsis skeletal muscle and adipose tissue microenvironments.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020Article
- Why a d-β-hydroxybutyrate monoester?Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET in abdominal sepsis in rats.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2020Article
- Ionic Modulation of Bacterial Virulence and Its Role in Surgical Infection.Surgical infectionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical metabolism has been a founding field of investigation in surgery without which the boundaries of critical care, trauma, and surgical oncology could not have advanced. Traditionally, understanding the shifts in electrolytes, carbohydrates, fats, and amino acids that could explain the rapidly evolving proteolysis after catabolic stress and tumor growth has been a major focus of research that led to our current approach to maintaining homeostasis over the course of major surgical intervention and injury.
methodReview of the English-language literature.
resultsWith the emerging field of inflammation and the discovery of cytokines and chemokines, surgical metabolism has taken a second seat in the surgical research arena. Yet central to all patient management after injury is an understanding of how catabolic stress erodes vital organ function and how current approaches can support metabolism through the most physiologically stressful perturbations known to man, for which there is no evolutionary precedent. Although it is well accepted that unabated proteolysis is not a sustainable physiologic state, in the era of modern medicine, precisely how to manipulate the body nutritionally to drive a recovery-directed immune response remains highly debated. This review incorporates multiple lines of inquiry in surgical metabolism, with a particular focus on sepsis.
conclusionThe changing landscape of previous paradigms in the field is discussed. Finally, how next-generation technology might spark renewed interest in this field among surgical investigators is considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.