Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394087›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2018

The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years.

Shannon J McCall, Philip A Branton, Victoria M Blanc, Sarah M Dry, Julie M Gastier-Foster, James H Harrison, Scott D Jewell, Rajesh C Dash, Rebecca C Obeng, Joan Rose and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep technology for the optimization of cryostorage.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  5. Biopreservation and biobanking · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Issues in the Use of Human Tissues to Support Precision Medicine.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon J McCall1 Department of Pathology, Duke University Health System , Durham, North Carolina.
Philip A Branton2 National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Victoria M Blanc3 Central Biorepository, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah M Dry4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Medical Center , David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Julie M Gastier-Foster5 Department of Pathology, Nationwide Childrens' Hospital and The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.
James H Harrison6 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
Scott D Jewell8 Program for Biospecimen Science, Van Andel Research Institute , Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Rajesh C Dash1 Department of Pathology, Duke University Health System , Durham, North Carolina.
Rebecca C Obeng9 Department of Pathology, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia .
Joan Rose10 College of American Pathologists , Northfield, Illinois.
Dawna L Mateski10 College of American Pathologists , Northfield, Illinois.
Albi Liubinskas10 College of American Pathologists , Northfield, Illinois.
James A Robb11 Consulting Pathologist and Former CAP Governor , Boca Raton, Florida.
Nilsa C Ramirez5 Department of Pathology, Nationwide Childrens' Hospital and The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.
Kathi Shea12 Brooks Life Science Systems , Indianapolis, Indiana.
College of American Pathologists · USDuke University Health System · USEmory University · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Virginia · USVan Andel Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal of this elective program is to provide requirements for standardization in biorepository processes that will result in high-quality specimens that can be used to support research, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. CAP uses a peer inspection model to ensure the inspectors have proper expertise and to promote educational efforts through information sharing. Lead inspectors are comprised of pathologists, PhDs, and managers of biorepositories and they are often supported by CAP staff inspectors. Accreditation is a 3-year continuous cycle of quality with a peer inspection occurring at the start of year 1 and a self-inspection and CAP desk assessment at the start of year 2 and 3. At this time 53 biorepositories are fully CAP BAP accredited and 13 are in the process of obtaining accreditation. There are currently 273 established standards with requirement lists customized based on the scope of activities performed by a biorepository. A total of 90 inspections were completed between May 2012 and December 2016. Sixty-one were initial inspections and 29 were reinspections. A total of 527 deficiencies were identified in the areas of Equipment/Instrumentation (22%), Information Technology (18%), Specimen Handling and QC (15%), Quality Management (16%), Personnel (11%), Safety (10%), Facilities (6%), and Regulatory (2%). Assessment of common deficiencies identifies areas of focus for continuous improvement and educational opportunities. Overall success of the program is high based on the current enrollment of 66 biorepositories, anecdotal participant feedback and increasing national recognition of the BAP in federal documents.

Indexed as

AccreditationBiological Specimen BanksHumansInformation DisseminationPathologistsQuality ControlSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesbiobankbiorepositoryCAP accreditationCLIA accreditationpreanalytic variablesquality management

Identifiers

PMID29394087
PMCPMC5824654
OpenAlexW2787978793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.