Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29393723›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2018

Strong associations of nine-point body condition scoring with survival and lifespan in cats.

Kendy T Teng, Paul D McGreevy, Jenny-Ann Lml Toribio, David Raubenheimer, Kim Kendall, Navneet K Dhand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nutrition and Aging in Dogs and Cats.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kendy T Teng1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3200-1545
Paul D McGreevy1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jenny-Ann Lml Toribio1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David Raubenheimer2 Charles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kim Kendall3 The Chatswood Cat Palace and Clinic, Roseville, Australia.
Navneet K Dhand1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of the study was to investigate the associations of a nine-point body condition score (BCS) with survival time and lifespan in cats.

methodsElectronic patient records from a cat-dominant primary practice in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, where the body condition of cats was regularly recorded using a nine-point BCS scale were obtained. The maximum BCS of each cat during the visits was used as the primary exposure variable. Two survival analyses were conducted to evaluate the associations of BCS with cats' survival and lifespan.

resultsIn total, 2609 cats met the selection criteria from 4020 cats screened. The median of the maximum BCS was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-7). Compared with cats with a maximum BCS of 6, increased hazards of death were observed in cats with a maximum BCS of 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.00-7.27), 4 (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.95-3.49), 5 (HR 1.43, 95% CI 11.5-1.76) and 9 (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.11-2.93). Median lifespan was 15.8 (IQR 13.5-17.6) years. Compared with cats reaching a maximum BCS of 6 in the same age group, cats reaching a maximum BCS of 4 (HR 4.15, 95% CI 1.26-13.67) or 5 (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07-2.85) between age 1 and 3 years, and a maximum BCS of 3 (HR 6.09, 95% CI 1.47-25.25) and 9 (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.27-4.04) between the age of 3 and 11 years had shorter lifespans. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There are significant associations of nine-point body condition scoring with survival and lifespan, and BCSs <5 and of 9 were found to be negatively associated with both. The study yielded information regarding a desirable BCS for cat longevity that veterinarians could consult with.

Indexed as

LongevityAnimalsAustraliaBody WeightCat DiseasesCatsFemaleMaleObesitySurvival AnalysisVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID29393723
PMCPMC11104206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.