ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2018
A 65‑gene signature for prognostic prediction in colon adenocarcinoma.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated single-cell and bulk tissue analyses reveal distinct macrophage subtypes and a candidate prognostic signature in colorectal cancer: implications for tumor immune characterization.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Downregulation of solute carrier family 4 members 4 as a biomarker for colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 6 Contributes to Murine Intestinal Tumorigenesis Driven by a MutantCancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Hallmark guided identification and characterization of a novel immune-relevant signature for prognostication of recurrence in stage I-III lung adenocarcinoma.Genes & diseases · 2023Article
- Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 6 (KLK6) as a Contributor toward an Aggressive Cancer Cell Phenotype: A Potential Role in Colon Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- PYY modulates the tumorigenesis and progression of colorectal cancer unveiled by proteomics.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- A Novel Pyroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Predicting the Prognosis and the Associated Immune Infiltration in Colon Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Collagen XI alpha 1 chain, a potential therapeutic target for cancer.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Improving the Prognosis of Colon Cancer through Knowledge-Based Clinical-Molecular Integrated Analysis.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- The Perspective of Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Lipoxygenases mRNA Expression in Colon Adenocarcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
- Down-regulated Solute Carrier Family 4 Member 4 Predicts Poor Progression in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic values of integrin α subfamily mRNA expression in colon adenocarcinoma.Oncology reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the molecular factors associated with the prognosis of colon cancer. Gene expression datasets were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus databases to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between colon cancer samples and normal samples. Survival‑related genes were selected from the DEGs using the Cox regression method. A co‑expression network of survival‑related genes was then constructed, and functional clusters were extracted from this network. The significantly enriched functions and pathways of the genes in the network were identified. Using Bayesian discriminant analysis, a prognostic prediction system was established to distinguish the positive from negative prognostic samples. The discrimination efficacy of the system was validated in the GSE17538 dataset using Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis. A total of 636 and 1,892 DEGs between the colon cancer samples and normal samples were screened from the TCGA and GSE44861 dataset, respectively. There were 155 survival‑related genes selected. The co‑expression network of survival‑related genes included 138 genes, 534 lines (connections) and five functional clusters, including the signaling pathway, cellular response to cAMP, and immune system process functional clusters. The molecular function, cellular components and biological processes were the significantly enriched functions. The peroxisome proliferator‑activated receptor signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway, B cell receptor signaling pathway, and cytokine‑cytokine receptor interactions were the significant pathways. A prognostic prediction system based on a 65‑gene signature was established using this co‑expression network. Its discriminatory effect was validated in the TCGA dataset (P=3.56e‑12) and the GSE17538 dataset (P=1.67e‑6). The 65‑gene signature included kallikrein‑related peptidase 6 (KLK6), collagen type XI α1 (COL11A1), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, wingless‑type MMTV integration site family member 2 (WNT2) and keratin 6B. In conclusion, a 65‑gene signature was screened in the present study, which showed a prognostic prediction effect in colon adenocarcinoma. KLK6, COL11A1, and WNT2 may be suitable prognostic predictors for colon adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.