Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392871›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2018

Challenges and Opportunities in Dose Finding in Oncology and Immuno-oncology.

Yan Ji, Jin Y Jin, David M Hyman, Geoffrey Kim, Ajit Suri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Beyond theJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Generalized Pairwise Comparisons in Dose Optimization Oncology Trials: Beyond Safety to Multi-outcome Dose Selection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Moving the needle for oncology dose optimization: A call for action.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan JiPK Sciences, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Jin Y JinClinical Pharmacology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
David M HymanEarly Drug Development Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Geoffrey KimOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Ajit SuriQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Takeda International Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Maximum Tolerated DoseAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DevelopmentHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID29392871
PMCPMC6039198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.