Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392858›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.

Robyn Lotto, Lucy K Smith, Natalie Armstrong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hope pluralism in antenatal palliative care.Journal of medical ethics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Addressing Perinatal Mental Health Risk within a Fetal Care Center.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The impact of prenatal counselling on mothers of surviving children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robyn LottoFaculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-0513
Lucy K SmithDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Natalie ArmstrongDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2013-06-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore parental decision making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly, and implications for healthcare encounters.

designQualitative semi-structured interviews with 38 parents-to-be were collated and triangulated with data generated from consultation recordings. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using a constant comparative-based approach.

settingRecruitment was undertaken across four fetal medicine sites in two tertiary referral trusts.

participantsParents-to-be whose pregnancy was suspected or diagnosed as being affected by a severe congenital anomaly. This sample was purposive to include known factors affecting the decision to terminate or continue the affected pregnancy.

findingsIn trying to make a decision about how to proceed with their pregnancy, parents-to-be typically had to work hard to negotiate multiple uncertainties around the diagnosis and prognosis of the suspected anomaly. This was influenced by parents' capacity to cope with uncertainty and the way in which uncertainty was managed by the clinical team. This negotiation of uncertainty was enacted within a fluid, nonlinear three-phase process: "information seeking," reflecting the way parents-to-be face the uncertainty associated with a fetal diagnosis and associated prognosis; "implications," where consideration is given to future consequences of the decision; and "decision making," which reflects the way in which the decision is made (head- or heart-led). Spectrums of responses were apparent within each phase.

conclusionsThis study provides important insights into how parents-to-be make decisions following diagnosis or suspicion of a severe congenital anomaly. The impact of these on healthcare encounters is discussed, alongside recommendations for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPrenatal DiagnosisUncertaintyAbortion, InducedAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansMaleParentsPregnancycongenital anomalydecision-makingfetal anomalypregnancyqualitativetermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29392858
PMCPMC5980539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.