ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018
Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe - evidence from the Eurolight study.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EpisodicStatinMig. A Multicentre, Triple Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of Atorvastatin in Episodic Migraine
ChronicStatinMig. A Multicentre, Triple Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of Atorvastatin in Chronic Migraine
Who cites it
137 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.
- Over 600 million people aged 18-65 will have headache tomorrow: global 1-day prevalence and recall bias from a meta-analysis of individual participant data (N = 38,512) from the general populations of 15 countries.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for chronic migraine with medication-overuse headache: a conservative meta-analysis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Pooled it
- Validation studies on migraine diagnostic tools for use in nonclinical settings: a systematic review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023Pooled it
- Are Morphometric Alterations of the Deep Neck Muscles Related to Primary Headache Disorders? A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment of resistant chronic migraine with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2022Pooled it
- A 52-week open-label extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine.Headache · 2026Trial
- Galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: results from the open-label period of the phase 3 PERSIST study.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Trial
- Galcanezumab in episodic migraine: the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PERSIST study.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2022Trial
- One-Year Remission Rate of Chronic Headache Comparing Video and Face-to-Face Consultations by Neurologist: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Differences in gray matter volume in episodic migraine patients with and without prior diagnosis or clinical care: a cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Trial
- Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with migraine and inadequate response to prior preventive treatment: subgroup analyses by country of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Trial
- The impact of fremanezumab on medication overuse in patients with chronic migraine: subgroup analysis of the HALO CM study.The journal of headache and pain · 2020Trial
- Alleviation of migraine symptoms by application of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to myofascial trigger points of neck and shoulder muscles - A randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Article
- Costs and use of antimigraine drugs in Italy: a ten-year analysis of national data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Methodology and baseline characteristics of the China Migraine registry (CHIME): a nationwide, multi-center, prospective cohort study of 11,814 patients.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Building bridges in migraine management: consensus pathways on best practices across primary and specialist care in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- NerveAI- a machine learning algorithm for detection of nerve pain in the head and neck.Scientific reports · 2026Article
77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is prevalent everywhere, and disabling. It is also neglected: consequently, it is under-diagnosed and undertreated. We analysed data from the Eurolight study on consultations and utilization of migraine-specific medications as indicators of adequacy of medical care in Europe.
methodsEurolight was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey in 10 European countries. Sampling was population-based in six (Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain) and from consecutive patients attending general practitioners (GPs) for any reason in three (Austria, France, UK). Additional samples in Netherlands and Spain, and the only sample from Ireland, were recruited by lay headache organisations. We recorded migraine prevalence and frequency, and utilization of medical services and medications (acute and preventative).
resultsAmong 9247 participants (mean age 43.9 ± 13.9 years, M/F ratio 1:1.4), 3466 (37.6%) were diagnosed with migraine (definite or probable). Of these, 1175 (33.8%) reported frequent migraine (> 5 days/month) and might clearly expect benefit from, and therefore had need of, preventative medication. In population-based samples, minorities of participants with migraine had seen a GP (9.5-18.0%) or specialist (3.1-15.0%), and smaller minorities received adequate treatment: triptans 3.4-11.0%, with Spain outlying at 22.4%; preventative medication (1.6-6.4% of those eligible, with Spain again outlying at 13.7%). Proportions were greater in GP-based samples (13.6-24.5% using triptans, 4.4-9.1% on preventative medication) and among those from lay organisations (46.2-68.2% and 16.0-41.7%). Participants with migraine who had consulted specialists (3.1-33.8%) were receiving the best care by these indicators; those treated by GPs (9.5-29.6%) fared less well, and those dependent on self-medication (48.0-84.2%) were, apparently, inadequately treated.
conclusionIn wealthy European countries, too few people with migraine consult physicians, with proportionately too many of these seeing specialists, and migraine-specific medications are used inadequately even among those who do. These findings represent yet another call for action in Europe to improve care for people with headache. Education of both health-care providers and the public should be central to this action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.