Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392529›Full record

ArticleThe patient2018

Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research.

James D Harrison, Wendy G Anderson, Maureen Fagan, Edmondo Robinson, Jeffrey Schnipper, Gina Symczak, Catherine Hanson, Martha B Carnie, Jim Banta, Sherry Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the Process of Patient Engagement: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Cancer Center Patient Advisory Group.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Public and participant involvement as a pathway to inclusive dementia research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

James D HarrisonDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. james.harrison@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7761-7039
Wendy G AndersonDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Maureen FaganCenter for Patients and Families, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Edmondo RobinsonDepartment of Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jeffrey SchnipperDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gina SymczakIntensive Care Unit Patient and Family Advisory Council, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Catherine HansonUniversity of Michigan Local Patient and Stakeholder Council, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Martha B CarnieCenter for Patients and Families, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jim BantaIntensive Care Unit Patient and Family Advisory Council, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sherry ChenDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Jonathan DuongDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Celene WongCenter for Patients and Families, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew D AuerbachDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 3455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to describe barriers to patient and family advisory council (PFAC) member engagement in research and strategies to support engagement in this context.

methodsWe formed a study team comprising patient advisors, researchers, physicians, and nurses. We then undertook a qualitative study using focus groups and interviews. We invited PFAC members, PFAC leaders, hospital leaders, and researchers from nine academic medical centers that are part of a hospital medicine research network to participate. All participants were asked a standard set of questions exploring the study question. We used content analysis to analyze data.

resultsEighty PFAC members and other stakeholders (45 patient/caregiver members of PFACs, 12 PFAC leaders, 12 hospital leaders, 11 researchers) participated in eight focus and 19 individual interviews. We identified ten barriers to PFAC member engagement in research. Codes were organized into three categories: (1) individual PFAC member reluctance; (2) lack of skills and training; and (3) problems connecting with the right person at the right time. We identified ten strategies to support engagement. These were organized into four categories: (1) creating an environment where the PFAC members are making a genuine and unique contribution; (2) building community between PFAC members and researchers; (3) best practice activities for researchers to facilitate engagement; and (4) tools and training.

conclusionBarriers to engaging PFAC members in research include patients' negative perceptions of research and researchers' lack of training. Building community between PFAC members and researchers is a foundation for partnerships. There are shared training opportunities for PFAC members and researchers to build skills about research and research engagement.

Indexed as

FamilyPatientsAdvisory CommitteesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEnvironmentHumansInterviews as TopicPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelTrust

Identifiers

PMID29392529
PMCPMC11034744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.