Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392427›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2018

Dry versus hydrated collagen scaffolds: are dry states representative of hydrated states?

Tomáš Suchý, Monika Šupová, Martin Bartoš, Radek Sedláček, Marco Piola, Monica Soncini, Gianfranco Beniamino Fiore, Pavla Sauerová, Marie Hubálek Kalbáčová

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aligned TiOPolymers · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vancomycin-releasing cross-linked collagen sponges as wound dressings.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomáš SuchýDepartment of Composites and Carbon Materials, Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, V Holesovickach 41, Prague 8, 182 09, Czech Republic. suchyt@irsm.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-4280
Monika ŠupováDepartment of Composites and Carbon Materials, Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, V Holesovickach 41, Prague 8, 182 09, Czech Republic.
Martin BartošDepartment of Stomatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Katerinska 32, 12801, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Radek SedláčekLaboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 4, Prague 6, 166 07, Czech Republic.
Marco PiolaDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Monica SonciniDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Gianfranco Beniamino FioreDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Pavla SauerováBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Marie Hubálek KalbáčováBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Funding

GAUK 400215Ministerstvo Zdravotnictvi Ceske Republiky 15-25813AMinistry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic Progres Q29/1LFResearch and Development for Innovations Operational Programme CZ.1.05/41.00/16.0346RVO 67985891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen composite scaffolds have been used for a number of studies in tissue engineering. The hydration of such highly porous and hydrophilic structures may influence mechanical behaviour and porosity due to swelling. The differences in physical properties following hydration would represent a significant limiting factor for the seeding, growth and differentiation of cells in vitro and the overall applicability of such hydrophilic materials in vivo. Scaffolds based on collagen matrix, poly(DL-lactide) nanofibers, calcium phosphate particles and sodium hyaluronate with 8 different material compositions were characterised in the dry and hydrated states using X-ray microcomputed tomography, compression tests, hydraulic permeability measurement, degradation tests and infrared spectrometry. Hydration, simulating the conditions of cell seeding and cultivation up to 48 h and 576 h, was found to exert a minor effect on the morphological parameters and permeability. Conversely, hydration had a major statistically significant effect on the mechanical behaviour of all the tested scaffolds. The elastic modulus and compressive strength of all the scaffolds decreased by ~95%. The quantitative results provided confirm the importance of analysing scaffolds in the hydrated rather than the dry state since the former more precisely simulates the real environment for which such materials are designed.

Indexed as

DesiccationBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium PhosphatesCollagenCompressive StrengthElastic ModulusHyaluronic AcidMaterials TestingMechanical PhenomenaPolyestersPorosityTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsWaterX-Ray MicrotomographyBiocompatible Materialscalcium phosphateCalcium PhosphatesCollagenHyaluronic AcidPolyesterspoly(lactide)Water

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.