Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392406›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2018

Importance of complete phenotyping in prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Mahmoud Aarabi, Olivia Sniezek, Huaiyang Jiang, Devereux N Saller, Daniel Bellissimo, Svetlana A Yatsenko, Aleksandar Rajkovic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Variants in Recurrent Euploid Pregnancy Loss.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fetal Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Review of Underlying Genetic Disorders and Prenatal Testing Options.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prenatal exome and genome sequencing for fetal structural abnormalities.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023
    Review
  16. How to choose a test for prenatal genetic diagnosis: a practical overview.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahmoud AarabiMedical Genetics and Genomics Laboratories, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Olivia SniezekWestminster College, New Wilmington, PA, USA.
Huaiyang JiangMagee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Devereux N SallerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel BellissimoMedical Genetics and Genomics Laboratories, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Svetlana A YatsenkoMedical Genetics and Genomics Laboratories, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Aleksandar RajkovicMedical Genetics and Genomics Laboratories, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. rajkovica2@mail.magee.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is an emerging technique in prenatal diagnosis. In this retrospective study, we examined diagnostic utility and limitations of WES in prenatal cases with structural birth defects. DNA from 20 trios (fetal and parental), with normal karyotype and microarray findings, underwent WES and variant interpretation at a reference laboratory. The WES results were later re-evaluated in our academic center utilizing prenatal and postnatal phenotyping. Initial analysis using only prenatal ultrasound findings revealed no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 20 pregnancies with structural birth defects. Re-analysis of WES variants and combination of prenatal and postnatal phenotyping yielded pathogenic variants in at least 20% of cases including PORCN gene in a fetus with split-hand/foot malformation, as well as variants of uncertain significance in NEB and NOTCH1 in fetuses with postnatal muscle weakness and Adams-Oliver syndrome, respectively. Furthermore, Sanger sequencing in a patient with holoprosencephaly, elucidated by postnatal MRI, revealed a pathogenic 47-base pairs deletion in ZIC2 which was missed by prenatal WES. This study suggests that incomplete prenatal phenotyping and lack of prenatal ultrasound-genotype databases are the limiting factors for current interpretation of WES data in prenatal diagnosis. Development of prenatal phenotype-genotype databases would significantly help WES interpretation in this setting. Patients who underwent prenatal clinical WES may benefit from the re-analysis based on detailed postnatal findings.

Indexed as

Prenatal DiagnosisCongenital AbnormalitiesDatabases, FactualExomeExome SequencingFemaleFetusGenotypeHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.