Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392371›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2018

Effect of intranasal esketamine on cognitive functioning in healthy participants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Randall L Morrison, Maggie Fedgchin, Jaskaran Singh, Joop Van Gerven, Rob Zuiker, Kyoung Soo Lim, Peter van der Ark, Ewa Wajs, Liwen Xi, Peter Zannikos and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02094378 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Intranasal Esketamine on Cognitive Functioning in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02094378 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Intranasal Esketamine on Cognitive Functioning in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2014Enrolled24ConditionsHealthyArmsEsketamine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Obstacles and Challenges?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Arketamine for cognitive impairment in psychiatric disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Randall L MorrisonNeuroscience Integrative Solutions, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA. rmorris5@its.jnj.com.
Maggie FedgchinJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Jaskaran SinghJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Joop Van GervenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob ZuikerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kyoung Soo LimCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter van der ArkJanssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Ewa WajsJanssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Liwen XiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Peter ZannikosJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Wayne C DrevetsJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of intranasal esketamine on cognitive functioning in healthy participants is assessed in this study.

methodsTwenty-four participants (19-49 years) were randomized to one of two treatment sequences in which either esketamine 84 mg or placebo was intranasally administered in a double-blind, two-period crossover design. Primary measures included five tests of Cogstate

resultsEsketamine was associated with significant cognitive performance impairment at 40 min postdose for all five Cogstate® tests (Detection p = 0.0011, Identification p = 0.0006, One-Card Learning p = 0.0040, One Back p = 0.0017, and Groton Maze Learning Test p < 0.0001) versus placebo. In contrast, performance on these tests did not differ significantly between esketamine and placebo at 2, 4, or 6 h postdose. Secondary outcomes indicated a significant, transient increase from baseline under esketamine versus placebo at 40 min postdose on the Mental Effort Scale and at 40 min and 2 h postdose on KSS (p < 0.0001 for both); however, no significant difference was observed on these outcomes between esketamine and placebo at later timepoints. The most commonly reported adverse events were dizziness (67%), nausea (37.5%), disturbance in attention (29.2%), and fatigue (29.2%); the majority were considered mild in severity.

conclusionsEsketamine was associated with cognitive performance decline, and greater effort was required to complete the test battery versus placebo at 40 min postdose, which returned to placebo-comparable levels by 2 h postdose.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02094378.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdultCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCross-Over StudiesDizzinessDouble-Blind MethodExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFatigueFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansKetamineMaleMaze LearningExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineCognitive functioningCogstate® computerized test batteryIntranasal esketamineTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID29392371
PMCPMC5869899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.