Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392357›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2018

Thyromental distance ("Patil") revisited : Knowledge and performance of a basic airway screening tool among European anesthetists.

H Ilper, A Grossbach, C Franz-Jäger, C Byhahn, M Klages, H H Ackermann, K Zacharowski, T Kunz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H IlperDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. Hendrik.ilper@web.de.
A GrossbachDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Canton Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
C Franz-JägerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
C ByhahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Campus, University of Oldenburg, Protestant Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany.
M KlagesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
H H AckermannInstitute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
K ZacharowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
T KunzDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity of St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting and managing the difficult airway is a lifesaving and vital basic task for the anesthetist. Current guidelines of all important societies include thyromental distance (TMD, "Patil") as a possible predictor for a difficult airway and includes two important aspects for airway management: the mandibular space and the flexibility of the cervical spine. We evaluated knowledge and execution regarding TMD for predicting a difficult airway on participants at the Euroanaesthesia (ESA) congress and German Anaesthesia Congress (DAC) in 2014. Our evaluation consisted of a theoretical part with questions regarding general knowledge and a practical evaluation with anesthetists performing on a human airway model. Practical evaluations were performed separately from other participants. During the DAC 245 (ESA 230) physicians participated, of which 64% were male (ESA 58%). At the DAC 182 (74.3%) and ESA 82 (35.6%) participants knew about Patil/TMD. Its use as a predictive score for a difficult airway was known by 122 (49.8%; DAC) and 79 (34.4%; ESA) participants. The correct definition for intubation was given by 45 (25.7%) at the DAC and 56 (24.3%) at ESA. Only 40-41% of the participants measured the correct distance for TMD. Only 6.1-6.5% completed both the theoretical and practical parts correctly. As non-invasive TMD includes two different aspects of patient airways and is part of current guidelines, education and training must be extended to assure adequate evaluation in the future.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAirway ManagementClinical CompetenceEuropeFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMandibleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThyroid GlandAirwayDifficult laryngoscopyGuidelinesNoninvasive predictor

Identifiers

PMID29392357
OpenAlexW2787376595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.