Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392193›Full record

ArticlePain reports2016

The dark side of opioids in pain management: basic science explains clinical observation.

Cyril Rivat, Jane Ballantyne

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05631834 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Bilateral Asymmetrical Erector Spinae Catheters Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Catheter Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Oesophageal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVinmec Healthcare SystemRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsPeri Operative AnalgesiaArmsThoracic epidurale, Erector spinae block
NCT06002464 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Benefit of Acupuncture Combined to Regional Analgesia for Post Operative Pain Relief After Hysterectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVinmec Healthcare SystemRan2023 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsAcupuncture, Bilateral ESP catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. The effect of workload on primary care doctors on referral rates and prescription patterns: evidence from English NHS.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The mechanisms and management of persistent postsurgical pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cyril RivatUniversité de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Institut des Neurosciences de Montpellier, INSERM U1051, Montpellier, France.
Jane BallantyneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Université de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the past 2 decades, opioids have been used increasingly for the treatment of persistent pain, and doses have tended to creep up. As basic science elucidates mechanisms of pain and analgesia, the cross talk between central pain and opioid actions becomes clearer.

objectivesWe aimed to examine the published literature on basic science explaining pronociceptive opioid actions, and apply this knowledge to clinical observation.

methodsWe reviewed the existing literature on the pronociceptive actions of opioids, both preclinical and clinical studies.

resultsBasic science provides a rationale for the clinical observation that opioids sometimes increase rather than decrease pain. Central sensitization (hyperalgesia) underlies pain chronification, but can also be produced by high dose and high potency opioids. Many of the same mechanisms account for both central pain and opioid hyperalgesia.

conclusionNewly revealed basic mechanisms suggest possible avenues for drug development and new drug therapies that could alter pain sensitization through endogenous and exogenous opioid mechanisms. Recent changes in practice such as the introduction of titration-to-effect for opioids have resulted in higher doses used in the clinic setting than ever seen previously. New basic science knowledge hints that these newer dosing practices may need to be reexamined. When pain worsens in a patient taking opioids, can we be assured that this is not because of the opioids, and can we alter this negative effect of opioids through different dosing strategies or new drug intervention?

Indexed as

Central sensitizationHyperalgesiaOpioidsPain chronification

Identifiers

PMID29392193
PMCPMC5741356
OpenAlexW2972393466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.