ReviewACS central science2018
Nanopore Electrochemistry: A Nexus for Molecular Control of Electron Transfer Reactions.
Review in ACS central science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Benchmarking of Glass and Silicon Nitride Nanopores for Single-Molecule Detection.ACS nano · 2026Article
- The Potential of Nanopore Technologies in Peptide and Protein Sensing for Biomarker Detection.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Resistive Pulse Sensing of Pre-Nucleation Activities during Single-Entity Lysozyme Crystallization on Single Nanopipettes.Sensors and actuators reports · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy of Nafion-Modified Nanopores.Journal of the Electrochemical Society · 2023Article
- Article
- COVID-19 challenges: From SARS-CoV-2 infection to effective point-of-care diagnosis by electrochemical biosensing platforms.Biochemical engineering journal · 2021Review
- The C2 entity of chitosugars is crucial in molecular selectivity of the Vibrio campbellii chitoporin.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021Article
- Nanohole-boosted electron transport between nanomaterials and bacteria as a concept for nano-bio interactions.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Acid-base chemistry at the single ion limit.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Single Entity Electrochemistry in Nanopore Electrode Arrays: Ion Transport Meets Electron Transfer in Confined Geometries.Accounts of chemical research · 2020Article
- Capture of Single Silver Nanoparticles in Nanopore Arrays Detected by Simultaneous Amperometry and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Perspective and Prospectus on Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pore-based structures occur widely in living organisms. Ion channels embedded in cell membranes, for example, provide pathways, where electron and proton transfer are coupled to the exchange of vital molecules. Learning from mother nature, a recent surge in activity has focused on artificial nanopore architectures to effect electrochemical transformations not accessible in larger structures. Here, we highlight these exciting advances. Starting with a brief overview of nanopore electrodes, including the early history and development of nanopore sensing based on nanopore-confined electrochemistry, we address the core concepts and special characteristics of nanopores in electron transfer. We describe nanopore-based electrochemical sensing and processing, discuss performance limits and challenges, and conclude with an outlook for next-generation nanopore electrode sensing platforms and the opportunities they present.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.