Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392107›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2016

In vivo MRI features of spinal muscles in the ovine model.

Stephanie Valentin, Tobey DeMott Yeates, Theresia Licka, James Elliott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephanie ValentinMovement Science Group Vienna, Equine Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tobey DeMott YeatesDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theresia LickaMovement Science Group Vienna, Equine Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
James ElliottDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle fatty infiltration (MFI) has been identified in patients with spinal pain using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Even though sheep are a commonly used animal model for the human spine, comparative sheep MFI data from MRI is not available. Determining MFI in sheep spinal muscles using acquisition protocols commonly used in man will identify the applicability of this approach in future sheep model studies, such that the effects of spinal interventions on muscle can be assessed prior to their use in a human (clinical) population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify ovine lumbar spine MFI using 3D 2-point Dixon and T1-weighted sequences. T1-weighted and Dixon lumbar spine axial sequences were collected in 14 healthy Austrian mountain sheep using a 1.5T MRI. At each vertebrae, the region of interest of psoas major and minor (PS), multifidus (M) and longissimus (L) were identified. To determine MFI from the T1-weighted images, mean pixel intensity (MPI) was calculated as a percentage of subcutaneous or intermuscular fat. For the Dixon images, fat sequence MPI was calculated as a percentage of the summed fat and water sequence MPIs. Spinal degeneration was graded and correlated to MFI. Dixon MFI was compared to T1-weighted MFI obtained from subcutaneous and intermuscular fat. For every muscle, T1-weighted MFI calculated using subcutaneous fat scored significantly lower than Dixon MFI and T1-weighted MFI calculated using intermuscular fat (p<0.001). There were no significant MFI differences between T1-weighted images calculated using intermuscular fat and Dixon images for M and L (p>0.05), although significant differences were found for PS. In sheep, Dixon sequences provide an acceptable comparison to T1-weighted sequences for lumbar extensor MFI based on intermuscular fat. However, compared to human literature, ovine lumbar musculature contains greater MFI, making interspecies comparisons more complex.

Indexed as

Animal modelsLumbar spineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle Fatty InfiltrationOvine

Identifiers

PMID29392107
PMCPMC5790160
OpenAlexW2209880253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.