Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392099›Full record

ReviewCureus2017

Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach.

Samer S Ghostine, Paul E Kaloostian, Christ Ordookhanian, Sean Kaloostian, Parham Zarrini, Terrence Kim, Stephen Scibelli, Scott J Clark-Schoeb, Srinath Samudrala, Carl Lauryssen and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Samer S GhostineNeurological Surgery, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.
Paul E KaloostianNeurological Surgery, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.
Christ OrdookhanianNeurological Surgery, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.
Sean KaloostianNeurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine.
Parham ZarriniCardiology, University of Miami, Medical School.
Terrence KimOrthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
Stephen ScibelliNeurological Surgery, Memorial Neurospine.
Scott J Clark-SchoebSpine Surgery, New Jersey Spine Center.
Srinath SamudralaNeurological Surgery, Pomona Valley Medical Center.
Carl LauryssenNeurological Surgery, St. David's Round Rock Medical Center.
Amandip S GillNeurological Surgery, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.
Patrick J JohnsonInstitute for Spinal Disorders, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
University of California, Riverside · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNeuroSpine Institute · USPomona Valley Hospital Medical Center · USPrecision Spine (United States) · USSt. David's Round Rock Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical repair of atlantoaxial instabilities (AAI) presents complex and unique challenges, originating from abnormalities and/or trauma within the junction regions of the C1-C2 atlas-axis, to surgeons. When this region is destabilized, surgical fusion becomes of key importance in order to prevent spinal cord injury. Several techniques can be utilized to provide for the adequate fusion of the atlantoaxial construct. Nevertheless, many individuals have less than ideal rates of fusion, below 35%-40%, which also involves the C2 nerve root being sacrificed. This suboptimal and unavoidable iatrogenic complication results in the elevated probability of complications typically composed of vertebral artery injury. This review is a retrospective analysis of 87 patients from Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had the C1-C2 surgical fusion procedure performed within the time frame from 2001 to 2008, with a mean follow-up period of three years. These patients had presented with typical AAI symptoms of fatigability, limited mobility, and clumsiness. Diagnosis of C1-C2 instability was documented via radiographic studies, typically utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans or x-rays. All patients had bilateral C1 lateral masses and C2 pedicle screws. In addition, the C1-C2 joint was accessed by retracting the C2 nerve root superiorly and exposing the joint by utilizing a high-speed burr. The cavity that is developed within the joint is packed with local autologous bone from the cephalad resection of the C2 laminae. Fusion of the C1-C2 joint was achieved in all patients and a final follow-up was conducted approximately three years postoperative. Of the 87 patients, two presented with occipital headaches resulting from the C1 screws impinging on the C2 nerve root. The issue was rectified by removing instrumentation in both patients after documenting complete fusion via radiographic studies, with complete resolution of symptoms. No vertebral artery or spinal cord injuries were reported as a result of the minor complication. Overall, we aim to describe a safe and reliable alternative technique to fuse C1-C2 instability by focusing on intra-articular arthrodesis complementing instrumentation fixation. This methodology is advantageous from a biomechanical standpoint secondary to axial loading, as well as the large surface area available for arthrodesis. Additionally, this technique does not involve the resection of the C2 nerve root, resulting in low risk for vertebral artery or spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

aaiatlantoaxialatlantoaxial fusionatlas axisc1-c2fusionintraarticularnerve rootspinal instability

Identifiers

PMID29392099
PMCPMC5788400
OpenAlexW2769942221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.