Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29392096›Full record

ReviewCurrent radiology reports2018

Breast Imaging of Transgender Individuals: A Review.

Emily B Sonnenblick, Ami D Shah, Zil Goldstein, Tamar Reisman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current radiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fibroadenoma in a transgender woman.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Unusual Male Breast Lesions.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Trans* Pregnancy and Lactation: A Literature Review from a Nursing Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily B Sonnenblick1Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, One Gustav Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Ami D Shah1Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, One Gustav Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Zil Goldstein2Department of Medicine, Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery at Mt. Sinai , 275 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10011 USA.
Tamar Reisman3Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, 275 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10011 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review will inform radiologists about the evidence base regarding radiographic imaging for transgender individuals and considerations for providing culturally sensitive care for this population.

findingsTransgender individuals are increasingly referred for both screening and diagnostic breast imaging. It is important that the clinic environment is welcoming, the medical staff utilize accepted terminology and patients are able to designate their gender and personal history to ensure appropriate care. Hormone and surgical treatments used for transition by many transgender women and men may change the approach to imaging. SUMMARY: Although not yet evidence-based, screening mammography is currently suggested for transgender women with risk factors, including those receiving hormone treatment over 5 years. The risk for breast cancer in transgender individuals is still being defined.

Indexed as

BreastMammographyScreeningTransgenderTranssexual

Identifiers

PMID29392096
PMCPMC5773616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.