ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2017
Defect Reconstruction of the Nose After Surgery for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: Our Clinical Experience.
Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paramedian Forehead Flap in Large Nasal Skin Defects: Twenty-years' Experience.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2022Article
- Shape Prediction of Nasal Bones by Digital 2D-Photogrammetry of the Nose Based on Convolution and Back-Propagation Neural Network.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Nonmelanoma Facial Skin Cancer: A Review of Diagnostic Strategies, Surgical Treatment, and Reconstructive Techniques.Clinical medicine insights. Ear, nose and throat · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate reconstruction methods according to nasal subunits in patients who were surgically treated with diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer of the nose.
methodsAll patients were retrospectively investigated. This study was conducted between April 2004 and December 2010; 180 patients who were surgically treated with diagnoses of skin basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, cancer of skin appendages, and precancerous lesions and 194 lesions were included. The types of repair performed were divided into seven main groups: Secondary healing, primary closure, skin graft, local flap, auricular composite graft, subtotal reconstruction and prosthesis application.
resultsAmong the 180 patients, 110 (61.1%) were males and 70 (38.9%) were females. The mean duration of follow-up was 39.8 (range, 32-81) months. Repair was by a local flap, a primary suture, a skin graft, and an auricular composite graft in 133, 16, 38, and 2 defects, respectively. Four defects were left for secondary healing. A prosthesis was applied to one patient. Totally, 194 defects were treated by surgery.
conclusionAlthough nonsurgical treatment options such as radiotherapy or cryotherapy may be effectively used, surgery is the main treatment option for cancer of the nasal skin. Nasal subunits have distinct characteristics; thus, optimal reconstruction should be preferred for each subunit. The objective of the reconstruction is not only closing the defect. Closing the defect appropriately with the optimal flap and in proper with the aesthetic subunits is the most important point in reconstruction of the nose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.