ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2017
Possible Ototoxic Effects of Topical Rifamycin Application: An Electrophysiological and Ultrastructural Study.
Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate possible ototoxicity associated with topical rifamycin application via electrophysiological tests and ultrastructural examinations.
methodsElectrophysiological assessment was performed with tympanometry, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements. This study was conducted on 40 ears of 20 guinea pigs that were detected to have normal hearing thresholds. The animals were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (n=12) received 0.1 mL rifamycin, Group 2 (n=8) received 0.1 ml gentamycin, and Group 3 (n=20) received 0.1 mL physiological saline. The antibiotics and saline solutions were administered via intratympanic injections. After five injections every other day, electrophysiological tests were performed again on the 15th day. After electrophysiological measurements, the temporal bones of all guinea pigs were prepared for ultrastructural examinations and the cochlear surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
resultsThe animals in group 3 did not show a statistically significant change in their DPOAE signal/noise ratio (SNR) or ABR thresholds (p>0.05). In groups 1 and 2, the reduction in the DPOAE SNR and the increase in the ABR threshold were statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding SEM examination results, the animals in groups 1 and 2 showed statistically significant outer hair cell damage and cochlear degeneration due to the ototoxic effect of the drugs (p<0.05), whereas the animals in group 3 showed no significant damage (p>0.05).
conclusionThe results indicate that rifamycin application to the middle ears of guinea pigs has mild ototoxic effects on their inner ears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.