ReviewTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2015
The Management of Thyroid Nodules.
Review in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Virtual Reality on Pain, Anxiety, and Fear During Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Impact of Thyroid Arterial Embolization on Clinical and Biochemical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Nodular and Multinodular Goiter.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology in Adequacy of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies without an Accompanying Cytopathologist.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2022Article
- TI-RADS Diagnostic Performance: Which Algorithm is Superior and How Elastography and 4D Vascularity Improve the Malignancy Risk Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thyroid nodules are extremely common and are detected in 3%-7% of the general population by palpation and in 70% of the population by ultrasonography (USG). Approximately 5%-15% of these nodules are malignant. Therefore, in nodule examination, our primary aim is to detect malignant nodules. Besides the medical history and the findings of the physical examination, USG and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) are the most commonly used methods to examine these nodules. Ultrasound-guided FNAB and on-site assessment of FNA specimens are suggested to decrease false negative and non-diagnostic test results. FNAB results in the "atypia of undetermined significance" group is challenging in the follow-up or treatment of the nodule. In this group, to differentiate the malignant nodules, other developing methods, such as analyzing molecular genetic markers, protein markers, and elastography, are generally studied. However, these methods are not used in a routine nodule examination because of cost-benefit analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.