Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391861›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2017

Noninvasive Assessment of Fibrosis Regression in Hepatitis C Virus Sustained Virologic Responders.

Hirsh D Trivedi, Steven C Lin, Daryl T Y Lau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2020
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirsh D TrivediDr Trivedi is a clinical hepatology and research fellow, Dr Lin is a gastroenterology and hepatology fellow, and Dr Lau is an associate professor of medicine at the Liver Center in the Division of Gastroenterology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven C LinDr Trivedi is a clinical hepatology and research fellow, Dr Lin is a gastroenterology and hepatology fellow, and Dr Lau is an associate professor of medicine at the Liver Center in the Division of Gastroenterology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.
Daryl T Y LauDr Trivedi is a clinical hepatology and research fellow, Dr Lin is a gastroenterology and hepatology fellow, and Dr Lau is an associate professor of medicine at the Liver Center in the Division of Gastroenterology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies and noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis has streamlined the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. DAA therapy is associated with a significantly higher rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) compared to interferon-based therapies. Concomitantly, validated noninvasive measures of fibrosis allow evaluation of patients for therapy without an invasive liver biopsy. Noninvasive measures of fibrosis can be classified as serologic tests or imaging modalities. Several serologic tests have shown robust reliability and clinical applicability. Similarly, imaging modalities such as vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography can be used to assess liver stiffness and correlate with fibrosis. Combinations of serologic and imaging tests further improve accuracy compared to an individual modality. The availability of noninvasive fibrosis measures coupled with high SVR rates has shifted the paradigm in the management of HCV infection in the DAA era. Although these noninvasive tests are valuable in evaluating hepatic fibrosis prior to HCV therapy, use of these measures in monitoring fibrosis regression after HCV eradication is currently limited. Furthermore, for patients with pretreatment cirrhosis, the association between fibrosis regression after successful therapy and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over time is unclear. There are no guidelines on long-term fibrosis monitoring and HCC surveillance after SVR is achieved. This article summarizes the current data on the applications of noninvasive methods to measure hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension in HCV. In addition, a road map is provided for monitoring patients with advanced fibrosis after HCV eradication.

Indexed as

fibrosisHepatitis C virusmagnetic resonance elastographynoninvasive serum fibrosis markersvibration-controlled transient elastography

Identifiers

PMID29391861
PMCPMC5786821
OpenAlexW2989122016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.