Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391855›Full record

ReviewBioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2018

Biological control of human disease vectors: a perspective on challenges and opportunities.

Matthew B Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chikungunya Virus: Unveiling Its Global Impact (2002-2024).Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Impact of SumiLarvParasites & vectors · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew B ThomasDepartment of Entomology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Penn State, University Park, PA 16802 USA.

Funding

Quantifying insecticide impact on malaria transmission: does resistance matter?R21AI113609 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI THOMAS, MATTHEW B · 2015 to 2016
$411k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI113609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical insecticides are the mainstay of contemporary control of human disease vectors. However, the spread of insecticide resistance and the emergence of new disease threats are creating an urgent need for alternative tools. This perspective paper explores whether biological control might be able to make a greater contribution to vector control in the future, and highlights some of the challenges in taking a technology from initial concept through to operational use. The aim is to stimulate a dialogue within biocontrol and vector control communities, in order to make sure that biological control tools can realize their full potential.

Indexed as

BiocontrolInsecticide resistanceIntegrated Vector ManagementMosquitoVector-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID29391855
PMCPMC5769823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.