Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2018
Economic burden of COPD in a Swedish cohort: the ARCTIC study.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative analysis of burden of topmost disorders requiring rehabilitation services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Red cell distribution width related to the severity of the disease in patients with AECOPD.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD in Different Settings: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021Pooled it
- The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe: results from a systematic review of the literature.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020Pooled it
- Primary care patients with mild or stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease need more support in disease management: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Trial
- Indacaterol/glycopyrronium is cost-effective compared to salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD: FLAME-based modelling in a Swedish population.Respiratory research · 2017Trial
- The Societal and Economic Burden of COPD in Saudi Arabia.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2026Article
- Estimating the financial burden of asthma among young adults in Sweden.European clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- The Burden of COPD with Type 2 Inflammation in North-West Continental Europe.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Review
- 20-year trends in excess costs of COPD.The European respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Non-Adherence to Self-Management Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Survey Using the Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- High use of short-acting βERJ open research · 2023Article
- Hospital Admission Rates in Patients with COPD Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- Is There an Association Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Renal Failure?Cureus · 2022Review
- Healthcare costs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Denmark - specialist care versus GP care only.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Treatment Patterns, Socioeconomic Status and Clinical Burden in Mild COPD: A Swedish Real-World, Retrospective Cohort Study, the ARCTIC Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
- Cost analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review.Health economics review · 2021Review
- Article
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a risk factor in primary care: a Canadian retrospective cohort study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We assessed direct and indirect costs associated with COPD in Sweden and examined how these costs vary across time, age, and disease stage in a cohort of patients with COPD and matched controls in a real-world, primary care (PC) setting. Patients and methods: Data from electronic medical records linked to the mandatory national health registers were collected for COPD patients and a matched reference population in 52 PC centers from 2000 to 2014. Direct health care costs (drug, outpatient or inpatient, PC, both COPD related and not COPD related) and indirect health care costs (loss of income, absenteeism, loss of productivity) were assessed. Results: A total of 17,479 patients with COPD and 84,514 reference controls were analyzed. During 2013, direct costs were considerably higher among the COPD patient population (€13,179) versus the reference population (€2,716), largely due to hospital nights unrelated to COPD. Direct costs increased with increasing disease severity and increasing age and were driven by higher respiratory drug costs and non-COPD-related hospital nights. Indirect costs (~€28,000 per patient) were the largest economic burden in COPD patients of working age during 2013. Conclusion: As non-COPD-related hospital nights represent the largest direct cost, management of comorbidities in COPD would offer clinical benefits and relieve the financial burden of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.