Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391716›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

Nanotechnology in oral cancer: A comprehensive review.

Monika Poonia, Karthikeyan Ramalingam, Sandeep Goyal, Supreet Kaur Sidhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Innovative nanoparticle strategies for treating oral cancers.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Engineering Polymeric Nanosystems against Oral Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Current Trends of Targeted Drug Delivery for Oral Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika PooniaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Karthikeyan RamalingamDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sandeep GoyalDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Supreet Kaur SidhuDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral health could be maintained by application of this technology in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Oral cancer is a debilitating disease, and numerous research activities are being pursued worldwide to combat this deleterious process. Nanotechnology is very diverse field that has revolutionized the industry and is setting new trends in the management of oral cancer. Hence, we performed a PubMed search on nanotechnology in oral cancer and found 211 articles related to this search. We have reviewed the reported literature to the best of our abilities and summarized the various aspects of nanotechnology, its role in diagnosis - nanodiagnostics and treatment of oral cancer - nanotherapeutics in this article.

Indexed as

Diagnosisnanotechnologyoral cancertherapy

Identifiers

PMID29391716
PMCPMC5763864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.