ArticleVeterinary world2017
Isolation and identification of a cellulolytic
Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Production of volatile fatty acids through microbial conversion of waste sludges: influence of substrates.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Establishment of a stable monoculture system forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploration of Multi-Source Lignocellulose-Degrading Microbial Resources and Bioaugmentation Strategies: Implications for Rumen Efficiency.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Isolation, Screening, Identification of Cellulolytic Bacteria and Optimization of Factors Affecting FPUase Synthesis for Bagasse Hydrolysis.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Regulation of Milk Fat Synthesis: Key Genes and Microbial Functions.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Cellulolytic characterization of the rumen-isolatedEngineering microbiology · 2024Article
- Screening and evaluation of the ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and their potential application as probiotics.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Screening the Rumen of Balochi Camel (Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Exploring the microbial diversity and characterization of cellulase and hemicellulase genes in goat rumen: a metagenomic approach.BMC biotechnology · 2023Article
- The study on the impact of sex on the structure of gut microbiota of bamboo rats in China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Sustainable Production of Microbial Isoprenoid Derived Advanced Biojet Fuels Using Different Generation Feedstocks: A Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Identification ofVeterinary world · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to isolate and identify a cellulolytic bacterium from the rumen fluid of Aceh's cattle. Biodegradation by cellulolytic rumen bacteria can be used as a source of cellulolytic bacteria that act to degrade feed fibrous material so as to improve the quality of nutrients and digestibility of feed ingredients at a cheaper price than the use of commercial cellulase enzymes. MATERIALS AND
methodsSamples were collected from rumen fluid of Aceh's cattle in Abattoirs (RPH) of Banda Aceh city, Indonesia, isolation, and screening of cellulolytic bacteria were done in Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
resultsThe S1 isolates showed ±2.5 cm of clear zone diameter. Microscopically, this strain was found to be a Gram-negative,
conclusionCurrent study suggests that cellulose hydrolytic bacteria isolated from rumen fluid of Aceh cattle on Bushnell Haas medium-carboxymethylcellulose agar, and some potent cellulose degrading bacteria have been identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.