Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391573›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2018

Myopia prevalence in Canadian school children: a pilot study.

Mike Yang, Doerte Luensmann, Desmond Fonn, Jill Woods, Debbie Jones, Keith Gordon, Lyndon Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Incidence and Risk Factors of Refractive Error in Children in Spain: CISViT Project.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Review of the Role of the School Spatial Environment in Promoting the Visual Health of Minors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recent Epidemiology Study Data of Myopia.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mike YangCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. mike.yang@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-0717
Doerte LuensmannCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Desmond FonnCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Jill WoodsCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Debbie JonesCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Keith GordonCanadian National Institute for the Blind, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lyndon JonesCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CACNIB Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA pilot study to determine the prevalence of myopia, proportion of uncorrected myopia and pertinent environmental factors among children in a suburban region in Canada.

methodsRefraction with cycloplegia and ocular biometry were measured in children of two age groups. Myopia was considered at a spherical equivalent refraction (SER) ≤-0.50 D in at least one eye. Parents completed a questionnaire that captured the child's daily activities.

resultsA total of 166 children completed the study (83 aged 6-8 and 83 aged 11-13). Myopia prevalence was 17.5% among the overall group, 6.0% among ages 6-8 and 28.9% among ages 11-13. Mean subjective SER in myopic children was -1.10 D (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.34 to -1.86 D) at ages 6-8 and -2.44 D (95% CI, -1.71 to -3.18 D) at ages 11-13. In this study, 34.5% of the myopic children were uncorrected, which represented 6.0% of the entire group of children. Mean axial length (AL) increased by 1.03 mm from ages 6-8 (mean 22.62 mm; 95% CI, 22.45 to 22.79 mm) to ages 11-13 (mean 23.65 mm; 95% CI, 23.45 to 23.84 mm; p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between AL and SER was -0.618 (p < 0.01). Binary logistic regression between outdoor time and the prevalence of myopia showed that one additional hour of outdoor time per week lowered the odds of a child having myopia by 14.3% (p = 0.007).

conclusionMyopia prevalence increased from 6% at ages 6-8 to 29% at ages 11-13. Thirty-five per cent of the myopes in this study were uncorrected. More time outdoors may be beneficial to protect against myopia onset.

Indexed as

AdolescentAxial Length, EyeCanadaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMyopiaPilot ProjectsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID29391573
PMCPMC5997685
OpenAlexW2794440725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.