Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391566›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Oral delivery of siRNA lipid nanoparticles: Fate in the GI tract.

Rebecca L Ball, Palak Bajaj, Kathryn A Whitehead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Novel Method to Silence Genes in Cryptosporidium.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Critical quality attributes of lipid nanoparticles andAsian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing mRNA-lipid nanoparticles as innovative therapies for autoimmune diseases.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Maternal milk cell components are uptaken by infant liver macrophages via extracellular vesicle mediated transport.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Current RNA strategies in treating cardiovascular diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Enteral Route Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca L BallDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Palak BajajDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Kathryn A WhiteheadDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. kawhite@cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0100-7824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral delivery, a patient-friendly means of drug delivery, is preferred for local administration of intestinal therapeutics. Lipidoid nanoparticles, which have been previously shown to deliver siRNA to intestinal epithelial cells, have potential to treat intestinal disease. It is unknown, however, whether the oral delivery of these particles is possible. To better understand the fate of lipid nanoparticles in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, we studied delivery under deconstructed stomach and intestinal conditions in vitro. Lipid nanoparticles remained potent and stable following exposure to solutions with pH values as low as 1.2. Efficacy decreased following exposure to "fed", but not "fasting" concentrations of pepsin and bile salts. The presence of mucin on Caco-2 cells also reduced potency, although this effect was mitigated slightly by increasing the percentage of PEG in the lipid nanoparticle. Mouse biodistribution studies indicated that siRNA-loaded nanoparticles were retained in the GI tract for at least 8 hours. Although gene silencing was not initially observed following oral LNP delivery, confocal microscopy confirmed that nanoparticles entered the epithelial cells of the mouse small intestine and colon. Together, these data suggest that orally-delivered LNPs should be protected in the stomach and upper intestine to promote siRNA delivery to intestinal epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdministration, OralAnimalsCaco-2 CellsFemaleGastrointestinal TractGene SilencingHumansLipidsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesRNA, Small InterferingTissue DistributionLipidsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID29391566
PMCPMC5794865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.