Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391392›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

A cerebellar mechanism for learning prior distributions of time intervals.

Devika Narain, Evan D Remington, Chris I De Zeeuw, Mehrdad Jazayeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Human Cerebellum Encodes Temporally Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Contextual neural dynamics during time perception in the primate ventral premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapid calibration to dynamic temporal contexts.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A cerebellar population coding model for sensorimotor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Neuroimaging Signatures of Metacognitive Improvement in Sensorimotor Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Devika NarainDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. dnarain@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-1273
Evan D RemingtonMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical University, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mehrdad JazayeriDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-6961

Funding

Neural mechanisms of timing in the oculomotor systemR01NS078127 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JAZAYERI, MEHRDAD · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
European Research CouncilNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about the statistical regularities of the world is essential for cognitive and sensorimotor function. In the domain of timing, prior statistics are crucial for optimal prediction, adaptation and planning. Where and how the nervous system encodes temporal statistics is, however, not known. Based on physiological and anatomical evidence for cerebellar learning, we develop a computational model that demonstrates how the cerebellum could learn prior distributions of time intervals and support Bayesian temporal estimation. The model shows that salient features observed in human Bayesian time interval estimates can be readily captured by learning in the cerebellar cortex and circuit level computations in the cerebellar deep nuclei. We test human behavior in two cerebellar timing tasks and find prior-dependent biases in timing that are consistent with the predictions of the cerebellar model.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremBlinkingCerebellumConditioning, PsychologicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleModels, TheoreticalNeural PathwaysPurkinje CellsTime Perception

Identifiers

PMID29391392
PMCPMC5794805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.