Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391362›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Associations between introduction and withdrawal of a financial incentive and timing of attendance for antenatal care and incidence of small for gestational age: natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series methods.

Jean Adams, Zelda van der Waal, Steven Rushton, Judith Rankin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit, Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-7830
Zelda van der WaalSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Steven RushtonSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Judith RankinInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health CDF-2011-04-001Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether introduction or withdrawal of a maternal financial incentive was associated with changes in timing of first attendance for antenatal care ('booking'), or incidence of small for gestational age.

designA natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series analysis.

settingA hospital-based maternity unit in the north of England.

participants34 589 women (and their live-born babies) who delivered at the study hospital and completed the 25th week of pregnancy in the 75 months before (January 2003 to March 2009), 21 months during (April 2009 to December 2010) and 36 months after (January 2011 to December 2013) the incentive was available.

interventionThe Health in Pregnancy Grant was a financial incentive of £190 ($235; €211) payable to pregnant women in the UK from the 25th week of pregnancy, contingent on them receiving routine antenatal care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean gestational age at booking. Secondary outcomes were proportion of women booking by 10, 18 and 25 weeks' gestation; and proportion of babies that were small for gestational age.

resultsBy 21 months after introduction of the grant (ie, immediately prior to withdrawal), compared with what was predicted given prior trends, there was an reduction in mean gestational age at booking of 4.8 days (95% CI 2.3 to 8.2). The comparable figure for 24 months after withdrawal was an increase of 14.0 days (95% CI 2.8 to 16.8). No changes in incidence of small for gestational age babies were seen.

conclusionsThe introduction of a universal financial incentive for timely attendance at antenatal care was associated with a reduction in mean gestational age at first attendance, but not the proportion of babies that were small for gestational age. Future research should explore the effects of incentives offered at different times in pregnancy and of differing values; and how stakeholders view such incentives.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultEnglandFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPregnancyPrenatal Carecommunity child healthhealth policyobstetricspreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID29391362
PMCPMC5829653
OpenAlexW2785772673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.