Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391360›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

GaPP2, a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women: study protocol.

Katy Vincent, Andrew Baranowski, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Judy Birch, Ying Cheong, Roman Cregg, Jane Daniels, Catherine A Hewitt, Gary J Macfarlane, Lee Middleton and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Effect of Neuromodulatory Drugs on the Intensity of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Symptoms of complex pelvic pain: A survey in three cohorts of women.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katy VincentNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-2492
Andrew BaranowskiPain Management Centre, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Siladitya BhattacharyaInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Judy BirchPelvic Pain Support Network, Poole, UK.
Ying CheongFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Roman CreggPain Management Centre, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Jane DanielsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Catherine A HewittBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gary J MacfarlaneEpidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Lee MiddletonBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Wojciech SzubertMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Irene TraceyNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amanda C de C WilliamsResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew W HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/688Department of Health EME/13/52/04Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects more than 1 million UK women with associated healthcare costs of £158 million annually. Current evidence supporting interventions when no underlying pathology is identified is very limited and treatment is frequently inadequate. Gabapentin (a GABA analogue) is efficacious and often well tolerated in other chronic pain conditions. We have completed a successful pilot randomised controlled trial Gabapentin for Pelvic Pain 1 (GaPP1) and here describe the protocol for our definitive multicentre trial to assess the efficacy of gabapentin in the management of CPP in women Gabapentin for Pelvic Pain 2 (GaPP2). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to perform a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised multicentre clinical trial, recruiting 300 women with CPP from up to 40 National Health Service hospitals within the UK. After randomisation, women will titrate their medication (gabapentin or placebo) over a 4-week period to a maximum of 2700 mg or placebo equivalent and will then maintain a stable dose for a 12-week period. Response to treatment will be monitored with validated questionnaires and coprimary outcome measures of average and worst pain scores will be employed. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that treatment with gabapentin has the potential to provide an effective oral treatment to alleviate pain in women with CPP in the absence of any obvious pelvic pathology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Coventry and Warwick Research Ethics Committee (REC 15/WM/0036). Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will make the information obtained from the study available to the public through national bodies and charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN77451762; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAminesAnalgesicsChronic DiseaseChronic PainCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPelvic PainAminesAnalgesicsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric Acidchronic pelvic paingabapentinpain management

Identifiers

PMID29391360
PMCPMC5879736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.