Trial reportThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2018
Shorter waiting times from education to colonoscopy can improve the quality of bowel preparation: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06111937 (Correlation Between Time Interval After Gastric Emptying With Ultrasound Assessment and Quality of Bowel Cleansing in Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Correlation Between Time Interval After Gastric Emptying With Ultrasound Assessment and Quality of Bowel Cleansing in Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study.Trials · 2022Trial
- Educating Outpatients for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Using Conventional Methods vs Virtual Reality Videos Plus Conventional Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Korean clinical practice guidelines for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- A Prospective Randomized Study to Predict Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: Comparison of Two Stool Collection Methods for the Objective Assessment of Final Rectal Effluent Clarity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vitamin drinks improve palatability and reduce adverse events associated to polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Effect of nurse-performed enhanced patient education on colonoscopy bowel preparation quality.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2022Article
- Improving the quality of colonoscopy: Impact of efficient and safer preparation protocols and shorter waiting times.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsAdequate bowel preparation is essential for an effective and safe colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation according to waiting times from education to colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective, investigator-blinded, randomized study was performed from December 2016 to March 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: within 2 weeks (group A, n=64) or more than 2 weeks (group B, n=66) from education about bowel preparation to colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the quality of bowel preparation as assessed by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The secondary outcome was the polyp and adenoma detection rate.
resultsA total of 130 patients were enrolled. The total BBPS score was significantly higher in group A (within 2 weeks from education to colonoscopy) than in group B (more than 2 weeks). Total BBPS scores were 8.25}0.97 in group A and 7.75}1.32 in group B (P=.017). The rate of good preparation (BBPS≥8) was higher in group A than in group B (78.1% vs. 59.1%, P=.020). The rates of polyp and adenoma detection were both slightly higher in group A (polyps, 42.2% vs. 38.5%, P=.667; adenoma, 31.2% vs. 22.7%, P=.275). A numerical trend was observed for the slightly superior polyp and adenoma detection rate in group A, but it was not statistically significant.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that shorter waiting times from education to colonoscopy can improve the quality of bowel preparation. Ensuring sufficient staff and equipment for endoscopy is one approach to reducing waiting times to colonoscopy. If waiting times can not be reduced, more contact through telephone, e-mail, and text messaging could be used to remind patients about information regarding bowel preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.