Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391248›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2018

Knowledge supports memory retrieval through familiarity, not recollection.

Wei-Chun Wang, Nadia M Brashier, Erik A Wing, Elizabeth J Marsh, Roberto Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Old-New Recognition Memory Revisited.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The structure of prior knowledge enhances memory in experts by reducing interference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sensitivity of Reality Monitoring to Fluency: Evidence from Behavioral Performance and Event-Related Potential (ERP) Old/New Effects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  11. Neural basis of goal-driven changes in knowledge activation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei-Chun WangCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States. Electronic address: ww83@duke.edu.
Nadia M BrashierCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States; Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Erik A WingCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Elizabeth J MarshCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States; Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States; Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.

Funding

Social Threat and Aging: Neural Mechanisms of Emotion RegulationR01AG034580 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Aging Changes to Perceptual and Conceptual Encoding in Perirhinal CortexF32AG049574 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, WEI-CHUN · 2014 to 2016
$164k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG049574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034580NIH HHS F32 AG049574NIH HHS R01 AG034580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic memory, or general knowledge of the world, guides learning and supports the formation and retrieval of new episodic memories. Behavioral evidence suggests that this knowledge effect is supported by recollection-a more controlled form of memory retrieval generally accompanied by contextual details-to a greater degree than familiarity-a more automatic form of memory retrieval generally absent of contextual details. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the role that regions associated with recollection and familiarity play in retrieving recent instances of known (e.g., The Summer Olympic Games are held four years apart) and unknown (e.g., A flaky deposit found in port bottles is beeswing) statements. Our results revealed a surprising pattern: Episodic retrieval of known statements recruited regions associated with familiarity, but not recollection. Instead, retrieval of unknown statements recruited regions associated with recollection. These data, in combination with quicker reaction times for the retrieval of known than unknown statements, suggest that known statements can be successfully retrieved on the basis of familiarity, whereas unknown statements were retrieved on the basis of recollection. Our results provide insight into how knowledge influences episodic retrieval and demonstrate the role of neuroimaging in providing insights into cognitive processes in the absence of explicit behavioral responses.

Indexed as

KnowledgeAnalysis of VarianceBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsOxygenReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultOxygenEpisodic memoryFamiliarityKnowledgeRecollectionSemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID29391248
PMCPMC6386578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.