Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391243›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Incentives facilitate developmental improvement in inhibitory control by modulating control-related networks.

Michael N Hallquist, Charles F Geier, Beatriz Luna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathways to Psychopathology Among Autistic Adults.Current psychiatry reports · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael N HallquistThe Pennsylvania State University, United States; University of Pittsburgh, United States. Electronic address: michael.hallquist@psu.edu.
Charles F GeierThe Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Beatriz LunaUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States.

Funding

Reward Processing in AdolescenceR01MH080243 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LUNA, BEATRIZ · 2008 to 2019
$5.5M
Adolescent striatal neurophysiological maturation underlying the transition to adult stabilization of behaviorR37MH080243 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BEATRIZ LUNA · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Neurodevelopmental Origins of Emotion Dysregulation in Borderline PersonalityK01MH097091 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HALLQUIST, MICHAEL NELSON · 2013 to 2016
$620k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH097091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080243NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH080243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of heightened sensitivity to incentives and relatively weak cognitive control, which may contribute to risky behaviors. Studies of brain activity have generally identified greater activation of the ventral striatum to rewards and less activation of prefrontal regions during control tasks in adolescents compared to adults. Little is known, however, about age-related changes in the functional brain networks underlying incentive processing and cognitive control. This cross-sectional study characterized the effects of incentives on inhibitory control during an oculomotor task using whole-brain functional connectivity analyses. During an fMRI scan, one hundred forty typically developing individuals completed an incentivized antisaccade task consisting of incentive cue, preparation, and response phases. We found that task modulation of control networks increased gradually from childhood to adulthood, whereas a network including ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex displayed an adolescent-specific peak in response to the receipt of outcomes, consistent with dual-systems models. Notably, however, greater modulation of salience and motor networks during the preparation phase mediated age-related improvements in antisaccade accuracy, whereas adolescent enhancement of value-related circuitry did not. Relative to neutral cues, both reward and loss cues enhanced task-related connectivity of the salience network when preparing to inhibit a saccade. Altogether, our findings suggest that incentives facilitate inhibitory control by enhancing the salience of one's responses and that over development, the recruitment of functional networks involved in saliency and motor preparation supports better performance.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultBrainBrain MappingChildCross-Sectional StudiesCuesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID29391243
PMCPMC5910226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.