Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391055›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

She knows that she will not come back: tracing patients and new thresholds of collective surveillance in PMTCT Option B.

Fabian Cataldo, Janet Seeley, Misheck J Nkhata, Zivai Mupambireyi, Edward Tumwesige, Diana M Gibb, Lablite team

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabian CataldoDignitas International, Medical and Research Department, P.O.Box 1071, Zomba, Malawi. f.cataldo@dignitasinternational.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-8951
Janet SeeleyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H9SH, UK.
Misheck J NkhataDignitas International, Medical and Research Department, P.O.Box 1071, Zomba, Malawi.
Zivai MupambireyiUniversity of Zimbabwe, P.O.Box MP167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Edward TumwesigeMedical Research Council /Uganda Virus Research Institute, Research Unit on AIDS, P.O.Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda.
Diana M GibbMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn WC1V 6LJ, London, UK.
Lablite team

Funding

Department for International Development 202037Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalawi, Uganda, and Zimbabwe have recently adopted a universal 'test-and-treat' approach to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (Option B+). Amongst a largely asymptomatic population of women tested for HIV and immediately started on antiretroviral treatment (ART), a relatively high number are not retained in care; they are labelled 'defaulters' or 'lost-to-follow-up' patients.

methodsWe draw on data collected as part of a study looking at ART decentralization (Lablite) to reflect on the spaces created through the instrumentalization of community health workers (CHWs) for the purpose of bringing women who default from Option B+ back into care. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with CHWs who are designated to trace Option B+ patients in Uganda, Malawi and Zimbabwe.

findingsLost to follow up women give a range of reasons for not coming back to health facilities and often implicitly choose not to be traced by providing a false address at enrolment. New strategies have sought to utilize CHWs' liminal positionality - situated between the experience of living with HIV, having established local social ties, and being a caretaker - in order to track 'defaulters'. CHWs are often deployed without adequate guidance or training to protect confidentiality and respect patients' choice.

conclusionsCHWs provide essential linkages between health services and patients; they embody the role of 'extension workers', a bridge between a novel health policy and 'non-compliant patients'. Option B+ offers a powerful narrative of the construction of a unilateral 'moral economy', which requires the full compliance of patients newly initiated on treatment.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health WorkersContact TracingFemaleHealth PolicyHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLost to Follow-UpMalawiMalePatient CompliancePopulation SurveillanceQualitative ResearchUgandaZimbabweCommunity health workersDefaultersLoss to follow upOption B+PMTCTPositionalityTracing

Identifiers

PMID29391055
PMCPMC5796350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.