Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391044›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

DeepARG: a deep learning approach for predicting antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data.

Gustavo Arango-Argoty, Emily Garner, Amy Pruden, Lenwood S Heath, Peter Vikesland, Liqing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 395 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
395citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

395 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Adaptive Response ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

335 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gustavo Arango-ArgotyDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Emily GarnerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Amy PrudenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Lenwood S HeathDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Peter VikeslandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Liqing ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. lqzhang@cs.vt.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1545756U.S. Department of Agriculture 2015-68003-23050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing concerns about increasing rates of antibiotic resistance call for expanded and comprehensive global monitoring. Advancing methods for monitoring of environmental media (e.g., wastewater, agricultural waste, food, and water) is especially needed for identifying potential resources of novel antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), hot spots for gene exchange, and as pathways for the spread of ARGs and human exposure. Next-generation sequencing now enables direct access and profiling of the total metagenomic DNA pool, where ARGs are typically identified or predicted based on the "best hits" of sequence searches against existing databases. Unfortunately, this approach produces a high rate of false negatives. To address such limitations, we propose here a deep learning approach, taking into account a dissimilarity matrix created using all known categories of ARGs. Two deep learning models, DeepARG-SS and DeepARG-LS, were constructed for short read sequences and full gene length sequences, respectively.

resultsEvaluation of the deep learning models over 30 antibiotic resistance categories demonstrates that the DeepARG models can predict ARGs with both high precision (> 0.97) and recall (> 0.90). The models displayed an advantage over the typical best hit approach, yielding consistently lower false negative rates and thus higher overall recall (> 0.9). As more data become available for under-represented ARG categories, the DeepARG models' performance can be expected to be further enhanced due to the nature of the underlying neural networks. Our newly developed ARG database, DeepARG-DB, encompasses ARGs predicted with a high degree of confidence and extensive manual inspection, greatly expanding current ARG repositories.

conclusionsThe deep learning models developed here offer more accurate antimicrobial resistance annotation relative to current bioinformatics practice. DeepARG does not require strict cutoffs, which enables identification of a much broader diversity of ARGs. The DeepARG models and database are available as a command line version and as a Web service at http://bench.cs.vt.edu/deeparg .

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialMetagenomeComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningSoftwareAntibiotic resistanceDeep learningMachine learningMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID29391044
PMCPMC5796597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.