Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391030›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2018

Patients want more information after surgery: a prospective audit of satisfaction with perioperative information in lung cancer surgery.

Nicola Oswald, John Hardman, Amy Kerr, Ehab Bishay, Richard Steyn, Pala Rajesh, Maninder Kalkat, Babu Naidu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Primer on adult patient satisfaction in perioperative settings.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola OswaldInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Laboratories, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
John HardmanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Amy KerrDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Ehab BishayDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Richard SteynDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Pala RajeshDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Maninder KalkatDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Babu NaiduInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Laboratories, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. b.naidu@bham.ac.uk.
Heartlands Hospital · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReceiving information about their disease and treatment is very important to patients with cancer. There is an association between feeling appropriately informed and better quality of life. This audit aimed to estimate patient satisfaction with perioperative information in those undergoing surgery for lung cancer and any change in satisfaction over time.

methodsA questionnaire (EORTC-Info-25) was administered prospectively to patients preoperatively and up to six months postoperatively. The preoperative questionnaire was completed by 292 patients and 88 free text comments were completed. Intrapersonal responses were compared over time.

resultsPatients were highly satisfied with information prior to surgery. The overall helpfulness of information did not change over time but satisfaction with the amount of information decreased. Patients who received more information about 'the disease' and 'things you can do to help yourself get well' were less likely to report a drop in satisfaction (Odds Ratio 0.858, 95% Confidence interval 0.765 to 0.961, p = 0.008 and OR 0.102, 95% CI 0.018 to 0.590, p = 0.011 respectively). Free text responses revealed patients most frequently wanted more information on the disease, aftercare and self-care. Suffering complications from surgery was not associated with a change in satisfaction with information postoperatively.

conclusionsPatients want to know more about their diagnosis, but also how to recover and cope with issues once they have gone home after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction with information may improve if patients are given more information on these topics.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionPerioperative CarePulmonary Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAssessmentEducationLung neoplasmPatientPatient outcomePatient satisfactionThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29391030
PMCPMC5796585
OpenAlexW2800405259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.