Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391025›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018

Detection of sleep disordered breathing severity using acoustic biomarker and machine learning techniques.

Taehoon Kim, Jeong-Whun Kim, Kyogu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Monitoring Sleep Apnea Severity Using Coarse-grained Labels.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Identification of OSAHS patients based on ReliefF-mRMR feature selection.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taehoon KimMusic and Audio Research Group, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Whun KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea. kimemail@snu.ac.kr.
Kyogu LeeMusic and Audio Research Group, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. kglee@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Bio & Medical Technology Development Program from Korean government, MSIP 2015M3A9D7066980Seoul National University Bundang Hospital(SNUBH) grant 06-2014-157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreathing sounds during sleep are altered and characterized by various acoustic specificities in patients with sleep disordered breathing (SDB). This study aimed to identify acoustic biomarkers indicative of the severity of SDB by analyzing the breathing sounds collected from a large number of subjects during entire overnight sleep.

methodsThe participants were patients who presented at a sleep center with snoring or cessation of breathing during sleep. They were subjected to full-night polysomnography (PSG) during which the breathing sound was recorded using a microphone. Then, audio features were extracted and a group of features differing significantly between different SDB severity groups was selected as a potential acoustic biomarker. To assess the validity of the acoustic biomarker, classification tasks were performed using several machine learning techniques. Based on the apnea-hypopnea index of the subjects, four-group classification and binary classification were performed.

resultsUsing tenfold cross validation, we achieved an accuracy of 88.3% in the four-group classification and an accuracy of 92.5% in the binary classification. Experimental evaluation demonstrated that the models trained on the proposed acoustic biomarkers can be used to estimate the severity of SDB.

conclusionsAcoustic biomarkers may be useful to accurately predict the severity of SDB based on the patient's breathing sounds during sleep, without conducting attended full-night PSG. This study implies that any device with a microphone, such as a smartphone, could be potentially utilized outside specialized facilities as a screening tool for detecting SDB.

Indexed as

AcousticsBiomarkersMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographySleepSleep Apnea SyndromesSnoringBiomarkersAcoustic biomarkerApnea–hypopnea indexDeep neural networkPolysomnography screening testSleep disordered breathing

Identifiers

PMID29391025
PMCPMC5796501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.